My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5.6. & 5.7. PCSR 05-11-2010
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Packets
>
2006-2010
>
2010
>
05-11-2010
>
5.6. & 5.7. PCSR 05-11-2010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/7/2010 3:52:11 PM
Creation date
5/7/2010 3:36:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
PCSR
date
5/11/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
74
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
31. The City Council has reviewed and carefully considered, along with all other <br />materials submitted by ERL, the Voith Report. As set forth above, the Council recognizes the <br />potential for some positive economic impacts related to the Landfill. However, the council finds <br />that: <br />• The Voith Report overstates the potential positive economic impacts of the Landfill, <br />for the reasons set forth in the September 8, 2009 Memorandum from the City <br />Administrator, which are incorporated in these Findings of Fact; <br />The potential for positive economic impacts is only one of many criteria and <br />considerations to be weighed in making a decision to amend the City's <br />Comprehensive Plan; and <br />The City Council does not agree that a present value economic analysis of any <br />proposed use should be a deterrn;ning factor in making a land use decision. <br />32. The City Council has considered and appreciates the efforts of ERL to mitigate the <br />negative impacts of a landfill expansion, particularly on the important Highway 169/2215[ Avenue <br />interchange, by reducing the size of the proposed expansion in the revised proposal and by making <br />an additiona120 acres of land available for potential development at the Interchange. However, the <br />Council finds that the Plan revisions do not outweigh the negative impacts of the proposed <br />expansion, or change the Findings of Fact set forth in this Resolution. <br />33. It is the City Council's conclusion, from all of the evidence submitted and the <br />testimony taken, that: <br />(1) An expansion of the Landfill will prolong the negative short term impacts of the <br />Landfill on the City and will inevitably have a long term negative impact on the tax base <br />generated from this area of the City; <br />11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.