Laserfiche WebLink
Administrative Subdivision & Variance Request Page 3 <br />Gina Havron <br />October 16, 1995 <br />1. The unique shape of the lot and surrounding wetlands pose a physical <br />• hardship in subdividing the parcel. The flag shape with the bulk of the <br />property to the rear, limits the applicant's development potential in a <br />zoning district that allows smaller rural lots. The flag shape also <br />precludes a public street from being constructed to meet the frontage <br />requirement as it would result in a long dead end street (also requiring a <br />variance). The ability to extend the public street to tie in with an existing <br />street is limited by neighboring lowlands and would involve the <br />cooperation from other property owners. <br />2. The proposed administrative subdivision is a reasonable use of the <br />property. The property is quite large (24.59 acres) and the minimum <br />lot size is only 2-1/2 acres. Therefore, a 14.59 acre parcel and a 10 acre <br />parcel would not be out of character for the area. <br />3. The variance will not be detrimental to the health, safety and welfare <br />of the area and is keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. <br />One of the purposes of the minimum lot width in this zoning district is <br />to disperse the driveway access points onto public streets. The <br />applicant has indicated that no new driveways would be constructed <br />on the new parcel and an easement would be granted to use the <br />existing driveway. <br />4. Granting the variance would not convey any special privileges to this <br />property owner that other property owners in this area would not have <br />with a similar sized parcel in terms of number and size of proposed lots. <br />• It is recommended the City Council approve the administrative <br />subdivision request by Gina Havron to divide a 24.59 acre parcel into a 14.59 <br />acre parcel (Parcel A) and a 10 acre parcel (Parcel B) with the following <br />conditions: <br />1. Park dedication in the amount of $500 be paid prior to recording the <br />administrative subdivision. <br />2. A surface water management impact fee in the amount of $61.80 be paid <br />prior to recording the administrative subdivision. <br />3. That both properties are serviced by the same driveway and that proper <br />cross access agreements are prepared and executed prior to recording <br />prior to recording the administrative subdivision. <br />4. A tree protection plan be submitted at the time of building permit <br />application for the proposed parcel. <br />5. Any wetland area be encumbered with a drainage and utility easement. <br />• <br />s:council:v95-11 <br />