My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6.1. - 6.5. SR 08-27-2001
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2000 - 2010
>
2001
>
08/27/2001
>
6.1. - 6.5. SR 08-27-2001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:32:37 AM
Creation date
5/14/2003 6:49:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
8/27/2001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
80
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Scott Harlicker <br />August 9, 2001 <br />Page Five <br /> <br />Bruce West, Fire Chief, has indicated that on the four apartment buildings he <br />needs the ability to get a fire engine within 150 feet of all areas on the building <br />perimeter. The building scale of approximately 330 feet long which means that a <br />fire access road needs to be provided airing the sides of the building and at least <br />partially along the back of the building. <br /> <br />City policy states that any water main containing hydrants is a public facility and, <br />therefore, must fall within easements so that the Elk River Municipal Utilities can <br />maintain and operate the water system. Therefore, the common areas either <br />need a blanket drainage and utility easement or specified easements need to be <br />provided on all utility routes. <br /> <br />The row houses and back-to-back units either need to be provided individual <br />sanitary sewer and water services to each unit or the association needs to be the <br />responsible party for sewer and water use fees. <br /> <br />D. Grading Plan Issues <br /> <br />1. The access roads to all of the row houses and back-to-back units should include <br /> concrete curb and gutter. <br /> <br />We have been working with the developer's engineer on grading plan issues, <br />most of which have been addressed. There are still a few minor issues such as <br />missing contours or mislabeled elevations. These issues can be corrected as the <br />project moves forward. <br /> <br />On the south property line behind building units 8-15, there is a single retaining <br />wall shown. By elevation, that wall would reach a maximum height of six feet. <br />The wall should be tiered. <br /> <br />In the same general location, the existing topography indicates a line of power <br />poles. Is there an easement to a utility company for these power poles? Can the <br />retaining wall and potentially the buildings encroach into the power line <br />easement? <br /> <br />5. All sidewalks within the development should be six feet wide. <br /> <br />If you have any questions regarding any of these issues, please call. <br /> <br />Sincerely, <br /> <br />Howard R. Green Company <br /> <br />Howard R, Green Company <br /> CONSULTING ENGINEERS <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.