Laserfiche WebLink
costs, but this is only an option for the web-based and phone payments. Zt is actually <br />against the law to collect a convenience fee in any other situation. <br />~ have accumulated a number of credit card vendors' information over tl~e past few years <br />and their costs do not vary signihca~atly from one to the other, but their offering of <br />services along with the basic credit card function does, Some focus an Internet payments, <br />some focus on phone payments, some focus on counterlretail transactions, and. sotne are a <br />combination. Zn determining a credit card vendor ~ chose to focus on these criteria: cost, <br />support, service offerings, and references, ~~when ~ started this research, service offerings <br />was not one of my initial criteria. Zn the last year tlaougll, the requests for credit cards <br />Dave come from more va~~ying wants and needs, and the ability to use the credit card as a <br />payment option in varying ways has becan~.e more necessary.} <br />~ have attached th.e i~~fornlation on a company called "Paymentus" that ~ would like the <br />commission to consider ERMU working with to provide credit card payments to our <br />customers, They offer a combination of services; phone payment, Web payment ~througl~ <br />a link fro~aa our website~, and face to face. Additionally, they allow you to set tl~e <br />processing cost at your comfort level by utilizing tl~e convenience fee as i0o% passed on <br />to the customer, o% passed onto the customer ~whicl~ would be a Z.75% transaction fee <br />to use, or some hybrid sharing of the convenience fee. <br />Paymentus leas sand that the ~r~ast popular fee sharing is actually no shari~~g, but having a <br />full 1 ao% convenience fee charged to the customer. ~f ~ Oo% is passed on to t~~e <br />customer, tl~e walk inlcounter customers would Dave to be provided a computer terminal <br />or a phone to ~~~ake the payment. ~f we swipe the card, we cannot charge a convenience <br />fee. To have the ability to tale a credit card payment at the front counter by swiping the <br />customer card, it would require tl~e purchase of a machine device for approximately $Gafl <br />and havi~ag a phone line for the maclalne to obtain an authorization. The processing cost <br />ranges from 2% to Z.95%, depending on the credit card. <br />Dete~~nining how much to charge the customer, or not to charge, is woz~th some <br />discussion, certainly, accepting credit card payments would be received well. ~t <br />becomes a matter of determining low much of a value E1~MU would receive by offering <br />credl.t cards to determine how much cost we want to absorb, Zf tl~e focus was hest <br />customer service,lao matter the cost, obviously we would pass nothing along to tlae <br />customer. It could be argued that tl~e customers who don't use the credit cards are then <br />subsidizing those that do. T mentioned above that there is so~.e cost no matter the form of <br />payment, whether it be staff time taking and processing the checl~s, or renting a box to <br />subsidize postage and then processing the checks. we also lave a cost of collecting past <br />due payments when people forget to pay an time, or can't make it to tl~e office, or Dave <br />no other means to pay. Thane costs are all ultimately subsidized by the rest of the <br />customers. There is some value to taking the credit card payment, knowing the money <br />will be in the bank, and also automating the processing of the payments. That being said, <br />the people who really want tolhave to pay by credit card will pay a fee to do so. <br />