My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
INFORMATION 4-5-10
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2000 - 2010
>
2010
>
04-05-2010
>
INFORMATION 4-5-10
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/13/2010 10:08:01 AM
Creation date
4/13/2010 10:06:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
4/5/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~ .~l ~~~txway ~~®~ A~~~ca~~~~~ <br />~~r~~~o~~r~ <br />Multiway stop control can be ~~seful as a safety measure <br />at intersections if certain traffic conditions exist, Safety <br />concerns associated with multiway stops include <br />pedestrians, bicyclists, and ail road users e~.pecting other <br />toad users to stop, Multiway stop control is used where floe <br />volume of tra~c an the intersecting reads is approximately <br />equal, <br />The rest~•ictions on the use of STOP signs described. in <br />Section 2B.5 also apply to multiway stop applications, <br />G~1IDAN'C~; <br />The decision to install multiway stop control should be <br />based an an engineering scurfy, <br />The following criteria should be considered in the <br />engineering study for a multiway STOP sign installation.; <br />.A., where txafhc control signals are justified, the multi- <br />way stop is aaa interim measure that can be bastalled <br />quickly to control traffic while arrangements are being <br />made far the i~astallation of the traffic control signal. <br />B• A~ crash problem, as indicated by 5 or anon reported <br />crashes in a 12-naanth period that are susceptible to <br />correction by a multi-way stop installation. Such <br />crashes include right- and lei-turn collisions as well <br />as right-angle collisions, <br />C. Minimum volumes; <br />1. The vehicular vahanae entering the intersection from <br />the major street approaches total of bath <br />approaches} averages at least 3a0 vehicles per hour <br />faa' any 8 hours of an average day, and <br />2. The combined vehicular, pedestrian, and bicycle <br />valunae entering the intersection from the miaaor <br />street approaches ~tota.l of both approaches <br />averages at least ~a~ units per hoar for the same ~ <br />hours, with an average delay to minor-street <br />vehicular tragic of at least ~a seconds per vehicle <br />dua-ing the highest hour, but <br />3. Zf'the 85t1a-perce~atile approach speed of the nnajor- <br />street traffic e~cceeds do n~ph, the minimum <br />vehicular volume warrants are 70 perceaat of the <br />above values. <br />lJ, where no sitagle criterio~a is satisfied, but whea'e <br />Ca~teria fl, C,l, and C.~ are all satisfied to 80 percent <br />of the nainimuna values, Criterion C,3 is excluded <br />fix ono this condition. <br />aPT~~N: <br />ether' ca~teaia float may 1}e considered ua an engineering <br />study include: <br />A, The need to control left-turn conflicts; <br />B, The need to coaatral vehiclelpedestrian conflicts near <br />locations that generate high pedestrian volumes; <br />C. Locations where a road. user, after stopping, cannot <br />see conflicting tx'af~ric and is not able to reasonably <br />safely negotiate the intersection unless conflicting <br />crass traffic is also required to stop; and <br />D, An intersection of two residential neighborhood <br />collector through) streets of similar design and <br />apea•ating characteristics where aaaultiway stop control <br />would improve traffic operational characteristics of <br />the intersection, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.