Laserfiche WebLink
I93ra Avenue -Speed Limits & Stop Sign <br />July 20, 2009 <br />P~~e z <br />Until such time as a MnD~T speed study on the new portion of I93ra Avenue is <br />completed, our construction plans call for the entire corridor to be signed at 30 mph, so <br />that the corridor will not be open to traffic without a speed limit sign. If MnD~T <br />comes back with a higher speed limit on the eastern portion, the city will be required to <br />change the speed limit signs to the allowable speed indicated by MnD~T's study. <br />~. Stop Sign Installation ®I93ra Avenue/avier Street <br />The Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices provides guidance for <br />multi-way or all-way stop sign applications, A copy of the information from the most <br />recent manual is attached, As you can see from this information, an all-way stop sign <br />installation is only typically warranted by vehicle traffic when it is at an intersection with <br />relatively equal traffic counts. This is certainly not the case at the intersection of ~aviet• <br />Street and I93ra Avenue. There is also guidance for installation based on traffic accident <br />history. But of course at this time, there is no traffic accident history of a type that <br />would be potentially elim~.n,ated by an all-way stop sign installation. Finally, under other <br />criteria that maybe considered is the issue of pedestrian/vehicle conflicts. At this point <br />in tithe, it is our opinion that the number of pedestrians utilizing the sidewalk on the <br />north side of 193rd Avenue from the Deerfield 3"~/Moods at Hillside neighborhood to <br />the south is not significant enough to warrant an all-way stop sign installation. <br />As I have told Mr. and Mrs, Rasmus in discussing this issue with them, we will monitor <br />the I93ra Avenue corridor as we do all new corridors relative to traffic volumes and <br />pedestrian usage. If either of these criteria rise to a level that we believe warrants an all- <br />waystop sign installation at Javier Street, we can easily male that recommendation to <br />the Council and install the additional stop signs at time. <br />Just for the Council's information, traffic control on I93ra Avenue is planned to be as <br />follows; <br />~ At Evans Street, the 3-legged stop situation on the 4-legged intersection will remain <br />in place but will be monitored closely, A fourth stop sign can easily be put i.n if it <br />becomes a problem. The geometries of construction for the new project will have <br />the intersection of Evans Street and I93ra Avenue completely constructed to accept a <br />signal system in the future. <br />® Auburn Street and I93ra Avenue will continue to have an all-way stop situation as <br />currently exists there. <br />® At Tyler Street and I93ra Avenue, the plans call for Tyler Street to a stop condition, <br />with I93ra Avenue not stopped. It is our feeling from traffic modeling that there will <br />be a much higher volume of traffic on I93ra Avenue than Tyler Street after <br />construction, thus the Tyler Street stop condition. Again, if the monitoring of the <br />new roadway after completion indicates an all-way stop installation is required, that <br />recommendation would be made to the City Council, <br />® At CSAH I3 Twin Lakes Road} and I93ra Avenue, there will be a stop sign on I93ra <br />Avenue and no traffic control along CSAH I3. This again, is based on traffic <br />volumes projected .into the future where CSAH I3 is anticipated to have a much <br />higher traffic volume than I93ra Avenue, <br />