Laserfiche WebLink
<br />LMCIT Auto Rates <br />~~ <br />,-° 250 . <br />'s 200 <br />~ 150 <br />° 100 <br />50 <br />0 <br />'90 '91 '92 '93 5A '95 <br />Underwritingyear ~ <br />®Liabiiy C]Physical ~rtege <br />- ~..~...~.,m..•..~•...~ <br />Can we reduce our costs by Leaving LMCIT? <br />It's pretty easy to promise lower costs. We could • <br />get into along-winded discussion about whether a <br />private insurance company would be able to reduce <br />losses or expenses enough to bring its costs below <br />LMCIT's while. still providing the same coverage and <br />making a profit. But we thought it might be more. <br />helpful to just take a look at what LMCIT's rates <br />have actually done over the past several years. Here <br />are some figures. <br />• Workers compensation - LMCIT's average rate <br />per $100 of payroll for 1995 is 10% lower than <br />the 1990 rate. <br />• Municipal liability - For 1994-95, LMCIT's <br />average rate per $1000 of city. expenditures is <br />about 9.6% higher than 1989-90 rates. That's an <br />average increase of less than 2% per year. • <br />• Property - LMCIT's 1994-95 rates per $100 of <br />value for property coverage are 3S% lower than <br />1989-90 levels. <br />• .Auto - LMCIT's average rate per vehicle far auto <br />liability coverage for 1994-95 is 2% lower than <br />the 1989-90 rate. Per-vehicle rates for auto <br />physical damage are 20% lower than 1989-90 <br />levels. <br />In short, LMCIT has a pretty solid record of giving <br />cities stable or decreasing premium rates. <br />