My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
INFORMATION 09-05-1995
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
1993 - 1999
>
1995
>
09-05-1995 SP
>
INFORMATION 09-05-1995
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/5/2010 1:58:50 PM
Creation date
4/5/2010 1:58:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
9/5/1995
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Cityll <br />•~J <br />fiver <br />Apri127, 1995 <br />Randy Sykes <br />Elk River Fire Compensation Task Force <br />415 tackson Avenue <br />Elk River, Minnesota 55303 <br />Dear Randy;, <br />For well over a year the Fire Department Compensation Task Force has been reviewing firefighter pay in <br />conjunction with discussing the conversion of the Elk River Fire Relief Association pension plan to a <br />defined contribution plan. Recently, the Council and representatives of the fire department met to discuss <br />the proposed compensation plan requested by the firefighters. As you know, that proposal was not <br />approved in its entirety during that initial meeting with the Council. Because I feel that it is important to <br />continue working toward a fair compensation package and the conversion, I requested that the Council <br />discuss this item further. <br />On April 3, 1995, the City Council again discussed the proposed firefighter compensation plan. After <br />discussion, a motion o$ering a compensation package for the firefighters was approved. The Council's <br />• proposal would set firefighter pay at for $22.25 per hour for all emergency calls and $8.00 per hour for all <br />other calls. Emergency hours on the seven holidays outlined in the original proposal would qualify for <br />double time pay, and firefighter pay would be reviewed annually as part of the City pay resolution. In <br />addition, the Council had already agreed to extra pay based on training and to a new pay structure as <br />outlined in the proposal. These are all contingent upon approval to convert the Relief Association pension <br />from a defined benefit to a defined contribution plan. <br />In an effort to assist in the conversion, I would like to address several areas of concern to the firefighters <br />and suggest solutions which should be agreeable to all parties. First, I understand that under the defined <br />contribution plan, the death benefit for firefighters not fully vested is less than it would be under defined <br />benefit. Naturally the firefighters are concerned about the amount available to their beneficiaries; the City <br />is concerned about this as well. Therefore, I am proposing that the City pay for any difference in the <br />death benefit for any firefighter who is currently a member of the department who dies after the <br />conversion to defined contribution. <br />Another issue of even more concern to the firefighters is the initial balance each firefighter will have in <br />his account after the assets of the Association are allocated among the members. There are several <br />methods of allocating the assets. The allocation can be made based on actuarial calculations which is the <br />method used by the Wyatt Company when estimated account balances were provided for us. The <br />allocation can also be made based on years, months, or days of sen~ice (service only allocation). If this <br />allocation method is used, the beginning account balances can be compared to either the balances used in <br />calculating Schedule 1 or the balance based on the vesting percentage to determine each member's gain or <br />loss. It appears that the firefighters prefer the service only allocation. 1f the assets are allocated to <br />member accounts based on this method, there may be a loss in some members' accounts when compared <br />to the amount the members would have received based on the current benefit of $2,30 per }'ear times the <br />years of service times the vesting percentage. Therefore, assuming a conversion date of January 1, 1996, I <br />. am proposing that the City cover all shortfalls. This would be accomplished by appl}~ng the City's 199 <br />1306 Orono Park~~~ay • P.O. Box 490 • Elk River, ~'li~T ~>330 • (612) 441-7420 • Fax: (612) 441-742 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.