Laserfiche WebLink
Planning Commission Minutes <br />June 12, 2001 <br />Page 4 <br /> <br />approved a land use amendment in 2000 to allow city sewer and water to be extended to this <br />area in 2001 and the property was immediately assessed. <br /> <br />Commissioner Mesich asked why the drawings were not presented to them until tonight. <br />Ms. McPherson stated that she received them yesterday. <br /> <br />Chair Pederson felt there are still some unknowns regarding the plat. <br /> <br />Commissioner Ropp stated he was not sure of allowing lot sizes of 12,000 square feet on the <br />lots with the ponds. Mr. Graser explained that there would be 30-40 feet from the back of <br />the homes to the pond. Mr. Harlicker stated that 20 feet of useable area is typical from the <br />back of the house to any type of easement. Ms. McPherson explained that the city's policy is <br />that easements are to be part of lots rather than outlots. Outlots tend to go tax forfeit, <br />which remits in a loss of tax revenue and a city maintenance responsibility. She stated that if <br />the Commission is concerned about the size of the lot, they could take Chair Pederson's <br />suggestion to reduce the size of the plat by one or two lots in order to accommodate larger <br />lots sizes for the lots in the area of concern. She noted that part of the reason the drawings <br />were submitted late was because staff and the developer had a difficult time getting a <br />response from the County Attorney. <br /> <br />Chair Pederson asked if there is still an outstanding issue with the County. Ms. McPherson <br />stated that the only request the County Attorney had was that the developer and staff speak <br />to the County Ditch Inspector. Mr. Graser noted that the ditch inspector is on vacation. <br /> <br />Commissioner Mesich stated that he was uncomfortable with the overall density of the plat, <br />if Outlot C will is to be platted as townhomes. <br /> <br />Commissioner Franz asked if a traffic study has been done to look at Street G and was <br />concerned that the City would have another "Auburn Street" problem, due to the density of <br />the development proposed for this area. McPherson stated that there could be a potential <br />traffic issue on a temporary basis. She explained that when the 75 acres to the south of <br />Kliever Lake Fields is developed, this property is adjacent to 175~h Avenue which will allow a <br />long term north-south connection from County Road 12 to 175th, as well as providing <br />another connection to the east to Fillmore Street. This "horse shoe" configuration will <br />provide road connections to go north to County Road, south to 175% east to Fillmore <br />Street, or west to Twin Lakes Boulevard. <br /> <br />Mr. Graser explained that the depth of the lots adjacent to the pond will be approximately <br />130'-140'. He noted that there will be drain rile in the back of every home. He explained <br />how the pond is designed to slope. He stated that the wetland will consist of 30'-40' of the <br />back of the lots. <br /> <br />COMMISSIONER BAKER MOVED TO TABLE THE REQUEST BY ~OLD <br />NUGGET DEVELOPMENT TO THE JUNE 26, 2001 PLANNING - <br />COMMISSION MEETING, BECAUSE OF UNRESOLVED ISSUES WITH <br />LAYOUT OF THE LOTS AND SIZE OF THE PONDING. COMMISSIONER <br />MESICH SECONDED THE MOTION. <br /> <br />Mr. Getz asked if there would be fire hydrants located in the plat. Ms. McPherson stated <br />that they would be required. <br /> <br />THE MOTION CARRIED 6-0. <br /> <br /> <br />