My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6.7. SR 07-16-2001
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2000 - 2010
>
2001
>
07/16/2001
>
6.7. SR 07-16-2001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:32:35 AM
Creation date
5/14/2003 2:14:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
7/16/2001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission Minutes <br />June 12, 2001 <br />Page 2 <br /> <br /> be accepted if, for some reason, the County decides not to allow expansion of the pond, as <br /> shown in the original plat. Mr. Horst requested that if the revised plat was necessary, he be <br /> allowed to add one additional lot by shifting the road over and extending the cul-de-sac <br /> slightly. <br /> <br />Commissioner Ropp asked where sidewalks would be located. Mr. Harlicker stated that <br />sidewalks are proposed on the south side of Street E and on Street G. Chair Pederson stated <br />that he suggested previously that sidewalks be added on Street A and Street B. The <br />Commissioners expressed their support for adding sidewalks on these streets. <br /> <br />Commissioner Mesich asked what would happen if the rezoning for Oudot C was denied. <br />Mr. Horst stated that Outlot C would then be developed with single family homes. He <br />explained that because of the soil conditions, they will mine material in the northeast coruer <br />of the site which will be used to raise some of the elevations in plat. The pond which will be <br />created from the mining will store storm water, thereby increasing the on-site storage <br />capacity. He noted that the townhomes are proposed to be built around this pond area.~ <br />Raising the elevations for the single family site will allow some variety in housing styles <br />including walk-outs, split entries, and split entry walk-outs. Efthe townhome rezoning is not <br />allowing, the grading of the site will change. <br /> <br />Commissioner Mesich asked if a grading plan was available. Mr. Graser stated that a grading <br />plan has been submitted to the city. Commissioner Mesich asked if hills will be built for <br />individual lots. Mr. Graser stated that the elevations of general areas in the site will be raised <br />to get above the sub-surface water elevation. He stated that the grading will be gradual in <br />order to meet the city's grade requirements for streets and drainage. Mr. Graser eXplained <br />the areas on the plat for split entry walk-outs, full basement walk-outs, and flat lots. <br /> <br />Chair Pederson asked if the elevations needed to raised in order to build basements. Mr. <br />Graser stated that without raising the elevations, the plat would consist of 99 split entry <br />houses and he did not feel this was a sound marketing practice. <br /> <br />Chair Pederson asked if the park was in a wetland. Mr. Graser stated that there is a very <br />small wetland in the southwest portion of the plat that has been delineated. Ms. McPherson <br />noted that the wetland is only .03 acres. Chair Pederson asked if Mr. Graser has considered <br />providing amenities for the park. Mr. Graser stated that he has not. Chair Pederson stated <br />that he did not support a longer cul-de-sac. He questioned the setbacks for the plat. Ms. <br />McPherson stated that the setbacks are 10 feet- front, 5 feet - side and 30 feet - rear. <br /> <br />Commissioner Franz questioned the zoning of the property. Ms. McPherson stated that it is <br />zoned Rle. <br /> <br />Commissioner Baker asked if the City Engineer had concerns regarding the plat. Ms. <br />McPherson referred to the City Engineer's memo which indicates he has had discussions <br />with the Assistant County Attorney, along with Mr. Graser, regarding the County's pond. <br />The Assistant County Attorney has asked that the proposed expansion of the pond be <br />verified with the County Ditch Inspector for his approval. <br /> <br />Commissioner Mesich asked if berming would be feasible to screen the adjacent county <br />road. Ms. McPherson stated that the applicant plans to install a combination of trees and six <br />foot high privacy fences along County Road 12. Ms. McPherson stated that berming would <br />be difficult, since the county road is a rural section in this area. This means there will be a <br />ditch, rather than storm sewer. Mr. Graser stated that there will be catch basins along the <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.