Laserfiche WebLink
Memo to Mayor & City Council/CU 01-21 <br />July 16, 2001 <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />Overview <br /> <br />The Municipal Utilities continues to expand its water production facilities into the east Elk <br />River area. In order to accomplish this, well and water treatment facilities must be <br />constructed. <br /> <br />The subject property is a remnant property, which the city purchased for the Twin Lakes <br />Boulevard (Tyler Street) road construction. The west portion of the subject property has <br />been utilized for Twin Lakes Road fight-of-way and the remnant property will be utilized for <br />the well and treatment facility with a portion possibly being sold to the adjacent developer to <br />the east. Located on the property was a single family home and Quonset hut. The property <br />is currently vacant and has a large wetland complex in the southeast portion of the property. <br /> <br />The Utilities proposes to construct Well #7 on the subject property and in concert with the <br />well, will also construct a water treatment and processing facility. <br /> <br />Project Description <br /> <br />The Municipal Utilities proposes to construct a 26' x 74' water treatment building <br />constructed of pre-cast raked finished concrete panels. The structure will be 17' high with <br />an interior roof of 14'10". Located in the building will be a filter, a backwash reclaiming <br />area, and space for a variety of chemicals used in the treatment of water. <br /> <br />The proposed structure will be located on the east side of Twin Lakes Boulevard 50' from <br />the property line. One driveway access is proposed which will be a "right-in right-out" on <br />Twin Lakes Road. The surrounding area is predominantly residential and staff would <br />suggest minor modifications to present a more residential design for construction. This <br />would include modifying the roof and perhaps changing the concrete panels to have a brick- <br />like texture impressed into them. <br /> <br />A landscape plan was not submitted, however, staff did develop a plan which includes <br />evergreen trees and overstory trees. <br /> <br />Parking is not a requirement for the use of this building. The proposed access driveway will <br />also serve as a parking area for the employee who will check on the operation of the facility <br />on a regularly basis. Staff would suggest, however, that a turnaround be included to provide <br />space for trucks to back into for ease of turning around. <br /> <br />Planning Commission Action <br /> <br />The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing at its June 26, 2001 meeting. No one <br />spoke for or against the request. The Commission tabled the request until the July 10, 2001 <br />in order to review building material and design options. <br /> <br />Staff presented three building design options for the Commission to consider. The <br />Commission voted 4-1 to recommend approval of the project with design Option 3. <br /> <br />S:\PLANNING\MICHMC\CCREPRTS\CU01-21 .DOC <br /> <br /> <br />