My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6.6. SR 03-15-2010
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2000 - 2010
>
2010
>
03-15-2010
>
6.6. SR 03-15-2010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/15/2010 4:00:48 PM
Creation date
3/12/2010 4:03:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
3/15/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
163
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
(ii) "After learning of appellant's application, the city <br />immediately enacted an interim ordinance and <br />commenced a study to determine whether <br />additional regulations should be placed on <br />pawnshops located in the city. <br />(iii) "Review of the council meeting minutes reveals <br />that a number of city residents objected to <br />appellant's application. But the minutes also <br />identify general concerns regarding the use and <br />placement of pawnshops, including: limitations on <br />the sale of guns and other items in pawnshops, the <br />location of pawnshops in proximity to polios <br />stations, hours of business, and the impact on <br />adjacent residential areas of pawnshops that offer <br />check-cashing services and other adult-oriented <br />businesses. <br />(iv) "The city council ultimately placed the moratorium <br />not just on the property, but on the entire city so <br />that a study could be conducted. <br />(v) "Unlike the City of Savage in Med. Servs., the city <br />promptly followed through with the study process <br />and ultimately amended its permanent zoning <br />ordinance based on the study's recommendations. <br />And the interim ordinance was limited in duxation; <br />only in effect for four months." <br />~I~ The ~ter~y c~ween ~nesa~a~s aaazc appro~a~ sa~~~e, ~c <br />oraor~u s~~e~ and c poe~° of ova o~ere~t a ~rnn <br />Zo~~n ~a~vs with aicai®~as p~~in <br />A. One might wonder, in light of a city's relatively broad authority under <br />Property Research and Rose Cliff to amend ordinances and then apply <br />them to pending ordinances, whether a city really needs to adopt a <br />moratorium in the first place. <br />1. In theory, a city could often skip the step of a moratorium (and <br />its additional burdens and regulations), and respond <br />I3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.