Laserfiche WebLink
~. ~~ory ~~~las an a cry's o~wer a ~ pose oraar~na; <br />a. ~n its original farm., ll~inn, tat, ~ 462.3 ~ 5, subd. 4, <br />imposed several important limits an the power of a city <br />to impose a moratorium, They included: <br />(i) The city must be "conducting studies" or "have <br />authorized a study to be conducted" for the <br />puzpose of adapting ox amending its <br />comprehensive guide plan or official controls, or if <br />new territory outside its zoning laws has been <br />annexed. The Court of Appeals' decision in Pawn <br />Amerzca holds that a city can authorize a <br />moratorium at the same time that it authorizes the <br />study. That is one of the questions for which the <br />Supreme Court has granted review. <br />(ii) Its period must not exceed one year from the date <br />it is effective (although, before August 2004, it <br />could be extended by the city in all circumstances <br />for an additional period not to exceed 1 ~ months). <br />(iii) Its purpose must be to "protect[] the planning <br />process and the health, safety and welfare of its <br />citizens." <br />(iv) It could not alter, delay or impede a subdivision <br />which has been given preliminary approval prior to <br />the effective date of the interim ordinance. <br />b. In 2004 the Legislature amended this subdivision, <br />although not to the degree requested by a coalition of <br />development interests. See Chapter ZS8 Minn. Laws <br />2004, § 1. The 2004 amendments had the following <br />effect: <br />(i) Extensions are only available in four limited <br />circumstances: where (1) less than 30 days before <br />the moratorium is set to expire, a federal, state ox <br />metropolitan agency whose approval is required by <br />law has not yet completed its review or approval; <br />(2) less than 30 days before the moratorium is set <br />9 <br />