6.6. SR 03-15-2010 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

t~ctober 7, 2005 Project 00790~.O~O,o Il~r. John Elks Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 520 Lafayette Raad North St. Paul, MN 55155 Mr, Matt Ledvina Natural Resource group, lnc, ~Ot~~ South Sri' Street, Ste 1000 Minneapolis, MN 55402 Subject: Response to MPCA Cornta~ent Letter dated July 2C, 2005 and Comments ernailed August 25, 2Q05 an behalf of the City of Elk River pertaining to the Revised Hydrageol~ogic Evaluation Phase ~ and 11) Report, Water Monitoring System Phase ~~~~ Report, and Phase r~ Water Quality Manitoring'~ork Plan, South Development Area, SWr74 Elk River Landfill, Elk River Minnesota Dear Mr. Elks and~Mr, Ledvina; Thank you far your reviews of the Revised Hydrogeolagic Evaluation Phase ~ a~~d ~Z~ Repo~~;, Water Monitoring System Phase r~~~ Report, and Phasc 1~ Water Quality Monitoring Work Plan, South Development Area prepared far the Elk River Landfill. Attached to this letter is an A.ddendun~ to the Revised Report containing replacement test and figures per the issued canunents, Below are respa~ases to the eornnaents provided in the July 2G, 2005 MPCA comment letter and the August 25 comments smelled on behalf of the City of Elk River, ~`or clarity, the original consents are reproduced in italics and are followed by responses in standard fart, PEA. ~oment~ dated Jul ~G X005 1. Sectr'on ~. ~~ 5 ~efe~ences three water level monitoring events, only two events were submitted in Ta~1e 3. The narrative wild be corrected to reflect data ~efe~enced in 7'a~le 3. The narrative has been changed as described and replacement test for Section 4,2.5 is included in the attached Addendum. ,~, deference to .~.PC.~ coretents dated ~a~gust 6, ~~D4, will ~e included in Section 8, D, ,References The following correspondence has been added to Section 8,01References section in the attached ,A.ddenduna: MPCA camn~ent letter to WM~ dated August ~, 2004 a MPCA comment letter to WM~ dated July ~~, 2005