My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8.1. SR 05-12-2003
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2000 - 2010
>
2003
>
05/12/2003
>
8.1. SR 05-12-2003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:32:35 AM
Creation date
5/9/2003 3:21:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
5/12/2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Xay 05 Z083 14:2Z:BG g~a F~x -> 7G34417425 A&m~n~strator P~ge 884 0£ 084 <br /> <br />-FridayFax- <br /> <br />A weekly legislative update from the League of Minnesota Cities <br /> <br />value homestead credit. Estimates of the cuts will <br />be posted later today on the LMC web site <br />(www,h'nnc.or~). <br /> <br />Perhaps one of the least understood components of <br />the House tax bill is the revised levy limits for cities <br />and counties. The bill includes severe levy limits <br />that will be in place for the next two year and these <br />limits will impact ALL cities. <br /> <br />The new levy limits are severe for two reasons-- <br />they will not allow cities to increase their property <br />tax for current state aid cuts and the computation <br />would no longer include an inflation adjustment. <br /> <br />In previous years, each city's levy limit has been <br />directly tied to LGA. If the city's LGA increased, <br />the city's levy limit would be decreased by the <br />same amount. Similarly, reductions in LGA would <br />result in a dollar-for-dollar increase in a city's levy <br />authority. <br /> <br />Under the House plan, each city's levy limit for <br />taxes payable in 2004 would not increase by the <br />amount of the 2003 reduction in LGA. However, <br />any increased cut in state aids in 2004 beyond the <br />cut in 2003 would result in increased levy authority. <br /> <br />May 5, 2003 <br />Page 4 <br />developed so that levy limits would not create an <br />incentive for cities to automatically levy to their <br />maximum. Under the House bill, these same cities <br />would lose all but 30 percent of their unused levy <br />limit. <br /> <br />In contrast to the Governor's levy limit proposal, <br />the House plan would use the current law definition <br />of "special levies" which are outside of levy <br />limits--including levies for debt service. The <br />governor's proposal would not have classified all <br />debt levies as "special levies" which would have <br />potentially restricted the ability of a city to increase <br />property taxes to cover debt service for some new <br />debt issues. <br /> <br />The House Tax Committee's bill will be introduced <br />today as HF 1597. The bill will be sent to the Ways <br />& Means Committee later today and will likely be <br />on the House floor for final consideration early this <br />week. There is still time to contact your <br />representative to express your concerns about the <br />aid cuts and levy limits contained in the House Tax <br />bill. <br /> <br />The levy limit calculation also eliminates the <br />inflationary adjustment based on the implicit price <br />deflator--which is now estimated to be slightly <br />more than 3 percent. The only growth in the levy <br />limit would be based on household growth and one- <br />half of the growth in commercial-industrial market <br />value. These two adjustments would only provide <br />very modest levy increases in rapidly growing cities <br />while fully developed cities would receive little, if <br />any increased levy authority. <br /> <br />The calculation of levy limits under the House bill <br />also eliminates most of any unused levy authority <br />for cities that did not levy to their limit for 2003. <br />Under current law, cities that are covered by levy <br />limits but who chose to levy at a level less than the <br />limit would preserve any unused levy authority for <br />future years. This feature of levy limits was <br /> <br />For mote information on oily legislalive issues, conlac! any member of Ihe League of Minnesola Cities Inlergovetnmenlal Relalions learn. <br /> 651.281.1200 or 800.925.1122 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.