My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6.5. SR 03-15-2010
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2000 - 2010
>
2010
>
03-15-2010
>
6.5. SR 03-15-2010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/12/2010 2:47:44 PM
Creation date
3/12/2010 11:18:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
3/15/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Cit~r Council Minutes <br />Feb~.uazy 1 G, 2010 <br />Page 4 <br />building from a PUD to a C3 zone change. He suggested that exception #14 be removed <br />from the PUD requirements. <br />Mayor I~linzing closed the public hearing. <br />Mayor I~li.nzing ques~.oned why the PUD couldn't be amended to eliminate exception #14 <br />and why staff didn't consider this approacl~ because it would've been easier. <br />Mr. Leeseberg stated the applicant didn't submit an application to amend the PUD but <br />rather to rezone to C3. He stated she could re-apply for a PUD but tl~.e timeframe would be <br />extended due to public hearing notice requirements. Mr. Leeseberg stated it would have <br />been easier to amend the PUD but didn't feel it was tlae correct solution from an overall <br />planning process. <br />The Council disagreed since their alread~T decided to review the entire area at a previous <br />meeting. Council noted the~r didn't want to hold the applicant up but stated they would life <br />to see the PUD amended. <br />Mr. Becl~ noted that tl~e city would need to follow procedure in order to amend the PUD. <br />He suggested making a motion to deny the request and direct staff to amend the PUD so <br />tlae applicant would not need to re-apply. He stated Council could direct staff to authorize <br />the building permits but the building couldn't be occupied until the PUD amendment was <br />approved, <br />N1[OVED BY COUNCILNIENIBER ZERwAS AND SECONDED BY <br />COUNCILNIENYBER GUNIPHR.EY TO DENYTHE REQUEST TO A1~END <br />THE CITY OF ELIK RIVER BONING NIA.P TO REDONE CERTAIN <br />PROPERTIES, AS DESCRIBED, PER CASE N0. ~C 1~-01 FRONT PUT] TO C3. <br />MOTION CARRIED 5-0. <br />MOVED BY COUNCILNIEIVIBER ZERwAS AND SECONDED BY <br />COUNCILNIENIBER GUNIPHREY TODIRECT STAFF TO .AMEND THE ELI <br />RIVER PLA.~A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT .AGREEMENT TO <br />RENT®VE THE RESTRICTION ON THE USE FOR. PARCEL L AND 'TO ISSUE <br />BUILDING PERI~I~TS TO THE GYNI LOCATED AT 5IS-5Z0 FREEPORT <br />STREET, NIOTTON CARRIED 5-0. <br />G.3. Reauef or Conditsonal Use permi~_ and_Lice~se Amendments by haste ~na~ement <br />Ms. Haug presented the staf rt. She reviewed t roposed changes to the conditional <br />use permit and the solid waste facility ' nse noted in her report. <br />Mayor I~linzing opened the pub ~ eating. <br />Deb Walters, Elk Riv andf~ll representative, 224GO Highwa 9 --Stated she agreed <br />with staffs chap on all items, Slae stated she disagreed with Item ' in tl~e draft <br />resolution a oving the application of Elk River Landfill, Inc. for an amen conditional <br />use per 'and license for the existing Elk River Landfill because it is currently pe 'ng i.n <br />co as a legal issue. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.