6.3. SR 03-15-2010 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

~~I~~~ Ago MQR~AN ~11f diver City Couneil Ma~~ch ~ ~, 2~ ~ ~ ~. Pale 1 ~ ~~. December 17, 200 aid main on ~anu~.ry 4, ~~ 1 ~, City plainly and un~.~.istal.~ably represented to Judie Marco that tiae parties' ~~~~ Host Can~n~unity A.~reeme~it's "lan~ua~e clearly refers to 'e~ ansians . , , an the Landfill ram,"' not to "expansiansr' onto Tiller's adjace~~t 1 a~.8-acre southern development area {~DA~ property, 11411 ~ City ~'.R~ .~ :~raposed Tema. and ~rde~~ at ~6-~7 {emplaasi~ added~;1 x.117109 City ~~~ ~ oral ~.r~ru~nent..~,.ncl, because there is na room fnr any rriaterial landfill e~pan~ion on tlae existing 1 X7,4-acre landfill property other than within. the ~Hwfoat buffer area at issue, City vas necessarily referring to e~pansior~ within this duffer area. Unless City is ~llin~ to ~ritlad.ra~v its prior representation to Judge Marco and instead argue that its "coaperatian" abligatian under the 2D0~ Host Con~nunity Agreement is mear~in~less, the New duffer (~xdinance, if adapted, will render City's priar representation as false. `L~~~ City CounciX should at least teznporarily ~.ecline the enactment of the ~ev~ I~uffcr ~~~dina~~ce. ~t xs extraordinarily bad p~~blic policy to ~~ush trough sl~ch arclinance a~ncndn~e~ats under the demonstrably false wise of "reaffi~.~r~~inga" pity's p~~rported. past "intent,,' particularly when the real purpose is to than e the la~v i;~ order to stop ESL's previously ~~led and „complete" February ~~, ~~~~ CUPILicerase a~e~.dn~ent application. .dully infarn~ed decisic~n~~nal~ing is especially impax~tant given tlae considerably raised stales due to City's "caoperatiH" obli~atiHS to ~~, in the ~.~~~ Host Community Agr~een~ent, ~Y~ ,~ Y, er JYp Attacl~rne~ats cc; City Administrator via email} p. deck (via e~a~ail} J. ~al~er {via email} ~. Jeffry (via e:~ail} ~, Aye~•s (via etnail~ ~. falters {via e~r~ail~ . Maltz via emaily