My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6.3. SR 05-12-2003
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2000 - 2010
>
2003
>
05/12/2003
>
6.3. SR 05-12-2003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:32:35 AM
Creation date
5/9/2003 3:20:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
5/12/2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
It was stated that at this point the City was looking at assessing residents for the improvements on <br />a per unit basis. The question was asked if a resident already had public sewer and water because <br />their property was also adjacent to Orono Road if they would be assessed for the installation of <br />utilities. Kristie stated that if the project progressed to the feasibility study, the City would look <br />at assessing all residents for the street improvements and possibly assessing only those currently <br />without utilities for the extension of the sanitary sewer and watermain. It was also stated that <br />there would be additional costs associated with the project. These included a sewer and water <br />hook-up fee, the cost of running services from the road fight-of-way to the home, abandoning the <br />septic system and well, and a monthly charge for usage. Kristie noted that if the project were <br />completed, residents would have two years from the time the utilities were available to hook-up <br />or the City would automatically charge the property owner the hook-up fees and start charging a <br />monthly user fee. <br /> <br />Residents along Mississippi Road asked if it would be possible to extend utilities to serve their <br />property in conjunction with the project. Kfistie noted that this could be included in the <br />feasibility study if enough interest was expressed. <br /> <br />Kristie asked for a consensus of those present regarding their interest in this project. Those <br />present indicated their general acceptance of proceeding to the feasibility stage of the project. <br />They were asked to indicate their interest on the sign-in sheet. A map noting the responses is <br />attached. <br /> <br />Kfistie stated this information would be provided to the City Council at an upcoming meeting. If <br />it was determined by Council that a feasibility study would be undertaken, notice would be <br />provided to the residents. <br /> <br />The Kristie thanked those present for taking the time to discuss this project with staff. <br /> <br />The meeting was adjourned. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.