Laserfiche WebLink
that "any entity" is allowed to provide <br />telecom services, yet 14 states have <br />laws, which the courts .have upheld, <br />that prohibit local governments from <br />providing these important telecommu- <br />nications services. <br />Congressional Action <br />The Community Broadband Act of <br />2007 was introduced in both chambers <br />last Congress. The legislation prohibits <br />states from precluding municipal gov- <br />ernments from offering competitive <br />alternatives to incumbent providers <br />and includes compromise language on <br />bailout provisions due to bankruptcies <br />and on the opportunity to bid com- <br />petitively. <br />The bipartisan Senate bill was ap- <br />proved by the Commerce, Science and <br />Transportation Committee last year. <br />While considered non-controversial, <br />the lack of any major movement on <br />telecommunications issues prevented <br />the full Senate from acting on this <br />legislation during its session. <br />The House measure was heard in the <br />Energy and Commerce Committee <br />in 2007 and was included as a title <br />in a draft bill on telecommunications <br />issues related to wireless consumer <br />protections, community broadband <br />and spectrum issues. Unfortunately, <br />due to issues regarding the wireless <br />consumer protections provisions in <br />the draft bill, the broader bipartisan <br />legislation was never formally intro- <br />duced. Both the House and Senate <br />bills are expected to be introduced in <br />the 111th Congress. <br />MMUA Position <br />Cities should be able to offer all <br />telecom services without barriers. The <br />contention that public bodies shouldn't <br />provide a service offered by private en- <br />terprise is disingenuous, since in many <br />areas of the state the private <br />sector is unable or unwilling to pro- <br />vide these services. In these localities, <br />municipalities may be the only viable <br />means of introducing such services. <br />this was often the case with electricity <br />over 100 years ago, and is still the case <br />with telecom today. Affordable, truly <br />high-speed broadband access is crucial <br />to a city's economic future. Federal <br />policy that facilitates consolidation and <br />limits any entity's ability to provide <br />services will not bring about benefits <br />to consumers. Regulation that protects <br />consumers from monopoly pricing and <br />predatory pricing must be enhanced. <br />MMUA urges Congress to: <br />recognize the positive role that <br />units of local government, <br />including municipal electric <br />systems, can play in enhancing <br />their communities by offering <br />advanced communication services; <br />support federal legislative efforts, <br />including the bipartisan <br />Community Broadband Act, that <br />protect the ability of local <br />communities to offer <br />telecom services; and <br />oppose federal efforts that would <br />restrict or prohibit local entities <br />from providing key communication <br />services. <br />