My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5.1. ERMUSR 03-09-2010
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Utilities Commission
>
Packets
>
2003-2013
>
2010
>
03-09-2010
>
5.1. ERMUSR 03-09-2010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/5/2010 4:55:50 PM
Creation date
3/5/2010 4:55:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
ERMUSR
date
3/9/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
In the process of reviewing this policy and related practices, staff worked with Minnesota <br />Municipal Utilities Association (MMUA) to gather information to use as a local industry <br />reference point on this subject. MMUA conducted a 10 question survey on electric commercial <br />customer deposits. (This survey is attached for reference.) There were 38 Minnesota municipal <br />utilities that participated in this survey, including Elk River Municipal Utilities. <br />The second question of the survey asks the amount of deposit required. The responses range <br />from $0 to 2 '/Z times peak usage. As noted, ERMU's deposit is 2 time the estimated monthly <br />usage. Depending on the customer, this may be a significant amount, possible as much as <br />$400,000. There are a number of utilities that responded with a deposit set at a fixed amount. <br />For ERMU with our diverse commercial/industrial customers, this method doesn't work well. <br />The deposit for a data center should be different than the deposit for an equipment rental place. <br />Most responding utilities required the deposit prior to providing service. ERMU connects <br />service and add the deposit to the bill. <br />Question 6 asks when the deposits are returned. Our policy allows for the deposit to be returned <br />after 3 years of good payment history. This doesn't protect ERMU against losses when a <br />commercial/industrial customer that has had good payment history and already had been returned <br />the deposit falls under difficult economic times and closes their doors. This is a current reality as <br />ERMU has recently seen long time commercial customers go out of business. To better protect <br />ERMU and the rate payers against these risks, the deposit would need to be held until the <br />account is terminated. Of the responding utilities, 22% hold the deposit until the account is <br />terminated. <br />Questions 9 and 10 pertain to receiverships. The survey notes that 8% of the responding utilities <br />require the documentation of the court order prior to establishing service. In ERMU's case, this <br />is done to verify the obligations of the receiver which may include a requirement to pay all prior <br />obligations if deemed necessary for the continued operation of the property. Although 8% is a <br />small percentage, it does represent more that just one utility. There were 8 utilities, including <br />ERMU, that require this documentation. There is also 12% that require the receiver to become <br />the customer of record. This establishes that the receiver is the responsible party for future <br />utility charges. These are signs of the state of the economy and utilities working to lessen the <br />impact to the paying customers by proactively controlling the risks associated with non-payment <br />of commercial/industrial accounts. <br />Based on information collected through MMUA's survey, ERMU's policy is in line with other <br />Minnesota municipal utilities. The legal efforts made by ERMU that extend beyond the policy <br />are also being made by other utilities. Because each situation is often unique, many times these <br />issues are handled case by case with legal counsel. To strengthen the policy and help to define <br />the intentions of the ERMU, an additional language should be added to clearly state that ERMU <br />will make every effort to collect on past due accounts. And as ERMU has seen with recent <br />trends that the current policy timeline for returning deposits doesn't always protect our <br />ratepayers from customers who default on their accounts. Staff recommends holding the deposit <br />until the account is closed in good standing. Also, Staff recommends that the amount of the <br />deposit for commercial and industrial customers have some flexibility. There is a difference in <br />risk between a commercial customer renting space and a commercial customer owning and <br />operating a data center. Staff has worked Gray Plant Mooty to incorporate these proposed <br />revisions. This proposed Customer Deposit Policy is attached for Commission review and <br />consideration. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.