My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2. PCSR AGENDA 03-01-2010
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Packets
>
2006-2010
>
2010
>
03-01-2010 JOINT
>
2. PCSR AGENDA 03-01-2010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/15/2013 8:26:30 AM
Creation date
2/26/2010 3:33:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
PCAG
date
3/1/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
#9 Currently developed properties are typically the most expensive to acquire. <br />#~0 Predominant factors are length of ~lighway ~0 needa.ng to be realigned and <br />wetland/poor soils impacted by Highway 10 realignment. <br />EC~N~I~A.T~~ <br />Based on the original project objectives, guiding principles, and circulation issues, the <br />planning team recommends the use of Option B as the preferred option. Staff believes that <br />this option achieves the goals established by the City Council, Economic Development <br />Authority, and Planning Commission the most effectively, and with the least amount of <br />taxpayer cost in the short and long term. Staff' also believes that Option A is a viable <br />alternative but not to the level of Option B. <br />~lhile option B does not meet the public's preferred option C explicitly, staff feels it <br />captures many of the goals enumerated in the petition of December ~ 4, 2010: <br />1t keeps residential properties residential, and commercial property commercial. <br />Option B also established a long term tt•affic pattern with the creation of an interim signal <br />where, an interchange can be located protects the long-term use of land in its present zoning <br />Bullets #1-4~. <br />None of the options prohibit the overpasses at 173x`' Avenue and 1715r Avenue, given <br />the current level of detail; however, optian B is a less expensive alternative, preserving <br />financial resources to complete these overpasses i.n the futureBullet #G}. <br />The plan does not reflect the cul-de-lacing of Ulysses Street Bullet #7~, <br />None of the options prohibit the overpasses at the railroad, given the current level of <br />detail. Option B is a less expensive alternative, preserving financial resources to complete <br />these overpasses in the futureBullet #S~. <br />Option B uses existing street networl~s urhere possible. The additional footage is <br />necessary to mini.tnize impacts on existing businesses and properties Bullet #9}. <br />S,~PLANNING MAIN~Projects~rAST Study Area~rAST memo to CC R~ transportation 3-1-10 Bruce-DH chan~es.doc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.