6.3. SR 02-16-2010 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Ms, Deb wal~er~ Februar}~ 3, ?0 ~ 0 Page ? zo~~ed Solid V~raste Facilities, However, the application curre~~tly pending befo~•e the City is not a~~ applicatiol~ to expand the solid waste disposal area and leas not been noticed to the public as such, The pending application could be a3l~ended to Include a request to expand the solid waste disposal area witI~in the landfill property, but a request for such axe an~e~~d~r~ez~t would have to include all of tl~e required submission i~laterials, a~~d notice to the public world lave to ve republished and ren~ailed sa that the public has been pro~~ided fair at~d reasonable notice of tl~e p~~oposed expansion. The landfill's current CUP and license expire on Februa~~y l7, x.010, The pending application fo~• a~~ amended CUP and license are scheduled to be heard by the Elk River' PIa~ln~ng Cola~~n~sslon on February 9, ?010, and the Elk River City Council on February ~ 6, col o. Unless the City is notified b~~ file la~~dfill in writil~g that the pending application is being withdrawn o~• amended, the hearings befo~•e the Plan~ling Commission and tl~e City Council on the pendixag application ufill proceed as scheduled. Mr. Perry's Ja~~uary ~S, 201D letter objecting to the buffer requi~•ement and proposing a ~,~71,300- cubicyard expansion of the landfill had attached to it one schematic drawi~ag slowing the expansion area, but included no other plans or materials that would de~aaonstrate low tlae expansion area would ~be screened, nor where the infrastructure to suppo~~t s~.~cla an expansion., such as service roads, wells, stoma water ~~.anagenaent, etc., would 'be locate. Nor is there any mention i~. Mr. Pen'y's letter as to v~Thether the N~in~aesota Pollution Control Agency, the Responsible Crovernnaental Unit for environmental review of an~r significant expansion of a laxadfzll, lags ~~e~liewed ox evaluated the potential enviro~ur~e~~tal effects of this proposed expansion, or° reviewed or approved this expansion proposal. ~f there is an environmental ~`eview process ~a~andated by the Mi~uaesota En~rironnae~atal Policy Act that iaas not beexa conapieted, the City of Ells River is prohibited from granting a~a anaezadn~e~at to tlae CUP or license alloying that expansion, Therefore, to the extent that Mr, Perry's letter constitutes a written request to a~~end the pending application to eliminate the ?o0-foot buffer zone and to i~~cz~ease tl~e capacity of the Ia~~df ll by Z,~71,300 cubic yards, this letter is to notif}~ the landfill, pursua~~t to Minnesota Statutes ~ 15.99, that this request to a~~end tl~e applicatio~~ is i~aco~~~plete for failure to submit the following materials zequired to evaluate such a~~ application for expansion: A co~~npleted Applicatio~~ Forz~n and Application Fee. labels for Property owners within ~5o feet of the Landfill Prope~~ty; obtained fro~x~ the Sherburne County Tax Division, A typewritten narrative describing tl~e expansion proposal. The following playas and additional info~~~natioz~; Gradi~ag Plan