My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6.1. SR 02-16-2010
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2000 - 2010
>
2010
>
02-16-2010
>
6.1. SR 02-16-2010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/1/2010 3:49:16 PM
Creation date
2/12/2010 9:24:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
2/16/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1l~Iemorandum <br />Date; 1126110 <br />To; Jeremy Barnhart, Planning Manager <br />Cc: <br />From: John Anderson <br />RE: Elk River Baat Storage <br />we have reviewed the plans provided including the following: <br />Site plan prepared by Lampert Architects dated 1,15,1 a <br />~ Civil plans prepared by Oliver Surveying ~ Engineering dated 111211 ~ <br />The following are comments provided to the developer in the previous review and comments <br />on any changes that have been made in the current submittal. <br />T1 1 1 1 . . . . .. . <br />r1 _KO[rr1Y/ltrlrr_f ho.rYyn~n i~~nl~y_~~~Lp[?frtn nnlnC to nvnYrn ~t in Inwrn nn~r Y7 <br />0. ~ Tl ZC1i <br />~ ' ' . Addressed in revisions <br />b} Sher ' t~n rrrnn nrnnnnc~~ nn~ ,~ ~ . . <br />~~ <br />Addressed in revisions <br />c~ the existi~ag easements that need to be extinguished. No documentation noted ~. revisions <br />d} the NPDES SwPPP is ok but needs the contractor signature before starting work when he is selected No <br />Change <br />e} No Change <br />t} there is a small drainage swale on the south side of the building that slightlycrosses the lot line. The drainage <br />talcs show this area takes a small amount of drainage from each Iot. This area needs to covered by an <br />additional D/U easement because the ~0 foot one on the plat is probably too small. Also we should get <br />proof in our files even though Sharp maystill own both lots that he has the right to grade on the adjacent lot. <br />The drainage easement needs to be expanded on Lot 6 Block 1 in this area to cover the <br />inhl~cation area. Provide proof of ownership on lot to the east. Also it appears the <br />landscape plan proposes to plant trees within the drainage and utility easerr~ent which <br />may make it dlfhcult to maintain the infiltration basin in the future for the owner. <br />_ a_QYnc~inti _rrrtr~trn n ns~ ~n nnnnnhnhi <br />~ ~ . <br />. <br />Addressed in revisions <br />In addition to these comments we would also like to see another issue addressed in the plans. <br />During the construction of the public roadway the developer requested curb opening be <br />constructed in anticipation of lot development. The plans need to indicate if any curb <br />openings are inplace for this lot,lf there are curb opening far the lot that will not be used the <br />opening should be elhnin.ated with the development of the lot. <br />BDM Prefect #22404 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.