Laserfiche WebLink
Ron kept demanding that we set up new accounts for the waterfront East project, <br />something there was no basis to do. There had not been a change in ownership of the <br />properties. <br />we left that Dec. l meeting agreeing that Peter would spell out in a document how the <br />disputed amount would be put into escrow and Ron said he would talk to the bank <br />involved in waterfront East about it. He was given a deadline to have the signed <br />document back into ERMU before the Dec.15t~' meeting}, <br />Eventually an agreement was reached and Ron paid the agreed upon amount. <br />Ron stated to the City Council that we contacted his tenants about the possibility of <br />turning off their power after he had paid the disputed amount. That is not true. At the <br />Dec.15 Commission meeting Tray Adams was directed to talk to the tenants to let them <br />know there was a dispute over a power bill and if it didn't get settled by the end of the <br />week, their power would be going off. That was done as a courtesy in case they had <br />machinery or computers that would be affected. Ron did not pay the disputed amount <br />until well AFTER the tenants were contacted, <br />I received a long voice mail from Ron on Dec. 28, 2009. He also called Jerry Gumphrey <br />with the same message, He went on and on about trying to get new accounts for the <br />waterfront East project since September and that what was wrong with our staff that this <br />hadn't been done, He again tried his bullying tactics, saying that he would spread the <br />word of ERMU's alleged incompetence to others in the city and the press. <br />I did not return his phone call but instead called Theresa that evening and asked her to <br />call Ron the next day and hopefully provide what he was looking for. Theresa did talk to <br />him and told him we were shorthanded because of the Christmas week but that she would <br />get it done by the first week of January, which she did. <br />Ran had no credible facts in this case to back up any of his claims, His basic claim was <br />that he was right because he said so. His intimidating tactics may work with others but I <br />think ERMU was right to stand up to him, In my mind, he owes the City Attorney a <br />sincere apology for the way he belittled and berated him. <br />His actions certainly were not appropriate far anyone, let along someone that is <br />representing the City on the Economic Development Authority. <br />