My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
INFORMATION 06-04-2001
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2000 - 2010
>
2001
>
06/04/2001
>
INFORMATION 06-04-2001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:32:33 AM
Creation date
5/7/2003 3:22:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
6/4/2001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Driveway 5 - 18019 Fresno Street <br />Staff measured this driveway at 30 feet, four inches, not 32 feet as measured by Mr. <br />Moldenhauer. Staff refuses to do anything about this one. This house has already Passed <br />a final inspection and four inches on a driveway width is certainly within tolerable <br />humane error. <br /> <br />Second Driveway 5 - 12441 196th Court <br />Perpendicular to its run, this driveway is 30 feet wide, not 43 feet as reported by Mr. <br />Moldenhauer. This driveway meets the city ordinance. Mr. Moldenhauer probably got <br />the 43 feet by measuring along the diagonal of the driveway's intercept with the cul-de- <br />sac. <br /> <br />Driveway 6 - 12302 195th LN <br />This house was built in the spring of 1997, prior to the city's ordinance regarding <br />driveway widths. <br /> <br />Driveway 7 - 12514 Vernon Ave. <br />This address would be in the City of Otsego, if it exists at all. Staff was unable to <br />decipher its location. <br /> <br />Driveway 8 - 12380 196th CIR. <br />This driveway is thirty feet wide as measure perpendicular to its run. Mr. Moldenhauer's <br />41 feet is probably a result of measuring diagonally along the driveways intercept with <br />the cul-de-sac. <br /> <br />Summary <br />Staff stamps each residential house plan with a note regarding the 30 feet maximum <br />driveway width. Although a permit is not required for a driveway, we do look at their <br />widths during our inspections. Only driveways 1 and 2 listed above constitute a violation <br />of the city's ordinance, at 2.5 feet and 1.5 feet over the maximum width respectfully. <br />Staff asks that the Council give direction on whether or not to have these two driveways <br />corrected. <br /> <br />Nonetheless, a violation of city code does not constitute a rationale for exceeding the <br />ordinance in another case. Staff sees nothing in Mr. Moldenhauer's letter that would <br />cause his variance to be reconsidered. <br /> <br />cc5.docs:\b&z\stever\cc5.doc <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.