My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5.3. ERMUSR 12-15-2009
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Utilities Commission
>
Packets
>
2003-2013
>
2009
>
12-15-2009
>
5.3. ERMUSR 12-15-2009
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/17/2009 9:54:38 AM
Creation date
12/17/2009 9:54:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
ERMUSR
date
12/15/2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
suppliers. Our ownership in generation at the Elk River Landfill provides 3.2 MW and 26M <br />kWh of renewable energy from four engines. Elk River Municipal Utilities sells this production <br />to GRE and is contracted to do so through 2022. After that the contract could be renewed or this <br />renewable resource could be part of ERMU's portfolio. The Landfill is currently flaring off <br />enough gas to support an additional 3 engines. If similar funding could be secured to expand the <br />Landfill Generation Plant as was used to build the original plant, it may be a good investment for <br />ERMU to make. This would put us in a better position when negotiating a future power contract. <br />Carbon tax legislation is looming. Connexus Energy, Wright Hennepin, and ERMU are served <br />by the same GRE generation portfolio. Some of the other local utilities have different generation <br />portfolios through different power agencies and therefore may be affected by carbon legislation <br />differently. In one form or another, utilities will see the costs associated with energy tax passed <br />on through our wholesale power costs. This increase in power costs impact our operating <br />expenses. An increase in expenses directly affects the rates. This will be a challenge for all <br />utilities. Keeping the customers informed will be very important. Elk River Municipal Utilities <br />needs to utilize the communication resources it has to proactively educate it's customers on these <br />changes. This could be done through our website, or our bills, or through new social <br />communication media. <br />4. Lame Customer/Local Employer Incentives <br />Although they can promote locate economic development, large customer and local employer <br />incentives can also be a slippery slope that could create an environment where the cost of service <br />is not fair or equitable for all customers. By creating an incentive too great, the cost associated <br />with that incentive is unfairly subsidized by the other customers. Yet there is reason to promote <br />and encourage large customers and local employers. This needs to be done with balance and <br />fairness in an equitable manner. A solution may be to provide a new customer an economic <br />development tariff that a new large customer or new local employer would qualify for the first <br />few months of service. This would help to promote new development and new jobs, but not <br />burden the rate payers for years to come. <br />5. Municipal Government Cash Requirements <br />Elk River Municipal Utilities exists because of the City. And although ERMU operates under <br />separate governance, it is owned by the City. With this comes a level of inherent liability and <br />accountability. There is also an opportunity cost in lost taxes with a municipal utility. It is fair <br />to the tax payers that the City realizes a return on investment. This is typically done through a <br />payment in lieu of taxes (PILOT) but is also often supplemented by donated utilities and labor. <br />For a statutory city that has established a utility governed by a separate utility commission, the <br />state statutes require a separation of funds. This separation gives an added level of <br />accountability and helps to ensure a fee doesn't become a tax. There is a need for accountability <br />and balance. Elk River Municipal Utilities needs to provide a return on investment to the tax <br />payers while providing fair and equitable cost of service to the rate payers. There are a number <br />of methods for a municipal utility to calculate the PILOT including, but not limited to: percent of <br />gross electric operating revenue, flat amount paid annually, property tax equivalent, assessment <br />of electric utility and city budgets, charge per kWh sold, percent of net utility plant in service, <br />and percent of income. According to a recent APPA study on PILOTS, percent of gross electric <br />operating revenue is the most commonly used method for this calculation. The study is attached <br />for reference. This method can create a positive relationship between a city and utility because <br />when the city helps the utility to prosper, the city also prospers. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.