My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5.1. & 5.2. SR 08-28-1995
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
1993 - 1999
>
1995
>
08-28-1995
>
5.1. & 5.2. SR 08-28-1995
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/3/2009 12:19:55 PM
Creation date
12/3/2009 12:19:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
8/28/1995
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Honorable Mayor and City Council <br />August 23, 1995 <br />• Page Two <br />4. Kenneth and Velda Brown have called and indicated they own two parcels which <br />they have tried to combine for tax purposes {75-470-0211 and 75-024-2116). <br />However, because one of the properties is platted and one is metes and bounds, the <br />County could not combine them. The City will verify that they are combined for <br />zoning purposes. We would recommend that the Brown parcels receive only one <br />assessment.. <br />S. Stacy and Yon Hui Hazelwood are in a similar situation. In fact, they bought their <br />property from the Browns. They have tried to combine it but once again, because <br />one is platted and one is metes and bounds, the County could not combine tltern for <br />tax purposes (75-024-2117 and 75-470-0210). The City wilt verify that they are <br />combined for zoning purposes, and we would recommend that the Hazelwood <br />parcels only receive one assessment. <br />At this time, the City has not received any formal written appeals from the property <br />owners. Individuals may appeal their assessment eo this project by presenting a signed, <br />written objection to the Mayor at the hearing. An individual sim~ln~~g ~n ar t <br />u 1' e i c <br />~,. Following the submission of a signed, written objection, the property owner also <br />• has to serve a notice of appeal upon the Mayor or City Administrator within 30 days after <br />the adoption of the assessment roll, and must file his notice with the District Court within <br />i0 days after serving the Mayor or Ciry Administrator. <br />At the close of the assessment hearing, it would be appropriate for the City Council to <br />consider the attached two resolutions. The f rst adopts the final assessment roll. This can <br />be adopted with any changes the City Council deems necessary. The second resolution <br />awards the contract for. the improvement. <br />If you have any questions, I will be in attendance at Monday evening's meeting. <br />Sincerely, <br />MSA, CONSULTING ENGINEERS <br />Q:~sc•~/ <br />Terry J. Maurer, P.E. <br />TJM aw <br />Attachments <br /> <br />~e ° .d -~nt~~d is rjsw s t = ~ ~ nHi s~-~~-~n~ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.