My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7.1. SR 07-24-1995
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
1993 - 1999
>
1995
>
07-24-1995
>
7.1. SR 07-24-1995
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/1/2009 4:05:58 PM
Creation date
12/1/2009 4:04:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
7/24/1995
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Gary Schmitz <br />June 21, 1995 <br />Page Two <br />3. The plat does show a general storm drainage concept with catchbasins and small <br />diameter pipe at low points which convey runoff, in some cases, to treatment ponds <br />ultimately flowing to wetlands on the project site. Prior to final plat approval, the <br />Developers should submit a detailed storm drainage plan including calculations on the <br />treatment pond sizing and the total flow of runoff anticipated relative to the wetlands <br />where it is expected to be stored. <br />4. The typical street section shown on the plan is incorrect. It indicates a total street <br />width of 30 feet. The City requirement is 32 feet. This should be corrected to show <br />an additional foot of width on each side of centerline. <br />5. The west end of 199th Avenue and the south end of Troy Street need to be provided <br />with temporary cul-de-sacs for the turning of maintenance vehicles, school buses, and <br />other types of large vehicles. Also, Troy Street to the north will need to be <br />constructed beyond the plat boundaries to connect to existing Troy Street. <br />6. The preliminary plat should be revised to show drainage easements where appropriate <br />around wetlands, treatment pond locations, or any other areas that storm drainage is <br />expected to flow. <br />7. Given the size of this development, an NPDES permit will be required. <br />8. On Lot 6 Block 4, there is an easement shown for the County Ditch 28 system which <br />has some type of structure contained within it. If it can be clearly documented that <br />the County draintile falls in this location, the building should be removed from the <br />easement area. If it is unclear exactly where the draintile runs, perhaps it would be <br />reasonable to allow the building there until work needs to be done in this area. <br />However, if the building is not relocated, the owner should be put on notice that <br />there is the potential that this will be required in the future. <br />If you have any questions regarding any of these comments, please call. <br />Sincerely, <br />MSA, CONSULTING ENGINEERS <br />Terry J. Maurer, P.E. <br />• TJM: tw <br />230/270-2118.jun <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.