Laserfiche WebLink
• employee development. Part E has a continuum to rate the employee overall, and an explanation <br />paragraph directly below it. There are signature lines for the employee, the supervisor that <br />completed the evaluation, and one for the City Administrator. As we previously discussed, a <br />supervisor should not meet with an employee to discuss the evaluation prior to the Finance <br />Director and the City Administrator having reviewed it for consistency. There is one addition to <br />Part C for only supervisors, and includes general traits necessary for supervisory personnel, such <br />as delegating, training/coaching, motivating employees, etc. <br />When the supervisor is notified that it is time to evaluate an employee, the employee should be <br />given a copy of the Self Appraisal Form. Employees should have approximately one week to <br />complete this form and return it to their supervisor. These forms have been extremely useful in <br />completing the employee's evaluation form and provides for meaningful discussion during the <br />evaluation meeting. When the Self Appraisal and the Performance Evaluation forms are complete, <br />and after review by the Finance Director and City Administrator, the employee should be given <br />a copy of the review prior to the evaluation meeting. This way the employee is not surprised by <br />anything they will be discussing during the evaluation meeting. It is common to have supervisors <br />give it to the employee the day before the meeting is scheduled, so that the employee can mentally <br />prepare for the meeting. Usually after the meeting all signatures are made and the original of the <br />Self Appraisal Form and the Performance Evaluation is placed in the employee's personnel file. <br />There is a provision on the Performance Evaluation Form for the employee to have two weeks to <br />make written comments on the Evaluation Form that will become an attachment to the original. <br />• As also discussed, using a form already available at the League's office will be more cost effective <br />than the creation of a new form. This form would allow flexibility to make changes to fit your <br />needs. The cost of this proposal is based on the form that we discussed at our July 10, 1995 <br />meeting. <br />There would need to be at least two trips to your City. One meeting would be with all of the <br />employees this new system would impact. This meeting is extremely important to the process. <br />Employees do not necessarily have to agree with the system selected by the City, but allowing <br />employees to express their comments and concerns contributes to an easier implementation. <br />During this same trip I would also meet with the Committee to discuss concerns and input <br />gathered from the employee meeting. I estimate meetings during this trip at approximately 5 <br />hours. <br />From this trip I would return to my office and either amend the form based on comments, or send <br />a letter and a copy of the proposed form to all employees and bargaining unit representatives. The <br />employees will have a week or so to write their comments down regarding the form. They should <br />give them to the Finance Director, anonymously, and she would collect them and forward them <br />to me after a certain deadline. <br />The second meeting's purpose is to provide training for evaluators in completing the appraisal <br />forms. This would include any supervisor or department head that would be charged with <br />. completing an appraisal and/or meeting with employees for an evaluation meeting. I would <br />estimate this meeting at approximately 4 hours. <br />