Laserfiche WebLink
Beaudry CUP Request <br />June 27, 1995 <br />• A. Site Plan <br />Page 2 <br />1. The proposed driveway on the north end of the site along the <br />railroad right-of--way does not meet the 10 foot required setback. <br />The plan will have to be adjusted to either meet this setback <br />requirement or a variance will be required. <br />B. Parking and Circulation <br />1. The proposed plans show a 38 foot wide driveway at the south <br />end of the site along Proctor Avenue. Staff is concerned with the <br />close proximity of this driveway to the existing driveway into <br />the Beaudry Express. There is the potential for a conflict in <br />turning movements as people enter and leave either of the sites. <br />It is recommended that the two driveways either be combined <br />into one common entrance drive or the proposed driveway be <br />eliminated. Eliminating the driveway will also improve the <br />internal traffic circulation between the two sites, particularly at <br />the westerly driveway connection between the two properties. <br />2. In order to help define the drive aisles and to provide possible <br />• landscaping opportunities, traffic controUlandscape islands are <br />recommended at the end of those parking rows which are <br />adjacent to primary drive aisles. Depending upon the redesign <br />of the parking area, these islands will need to be considered <br />with the final set of plans. <br />3. Interior drive aisles and entrances onto Proctor should align <br />with one another to allow for easy ingress and egress <br />movements. The proposed plans have a couple of situations <br />where drive aisles are off-set. <br />4. The car wash waiting lane as proposed allows for the stacking of <br />five vehicles which is in accordance v~Tth the. City's ordinance. It <br />also occurs outside the drive aisle which will not impact on-site <br />circulation. <br />C. Landscaping <br />1. A complete landscaping plan will need to be submitted prior to <br />issuance of a building permit. The proposed plans do not <br />provide enough information for staff review. <br />2. The site currently has existing conifers along the railroad right- <br />of-way on the north end of the site and a large stand of mature <br />s:planning:pc: CU95-10 <br />