My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7.3. SR 06-19-1995
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
1993 - 1999
>
1995
>
06-19-1995
>
7.3. SR 06-19-1995
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/30/2009 11:19:26 AM
Creation date
11/30/2009 11:19:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
6/26/1995
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Memo to Planning Commission <br />May 23, 1995 <br />Page 3 <br />apparently do not get much use because they aze so faz away from the businesses. <br />Although there is an adequate number of parking stalls, their convenience for <br />• customers is questionable, and therefore the businesses may have to practice better <br />management of having their employees park in those less convenient stalls and leave <br />the remaining stalls available for customers. <br />The distribution or availability of the parking stalls for the second freestanding <br />building appears to be less of a concern. The parking is equally distributed around <br />three sides of the building, providing ample opportunity for customers. Although <br />there is a loss of approximately nine stalls as a result of installing four overhead <br />doors, the intensity of the use from retail to automotive repair allows for that <br />reduction. Overall, with the reduced square footage of the second freestanding <br />building and less intense use, it appeazs that parking will be less of a concern on the <br />south end of the site than the north end where the existing businesses are not <br />operating. <br />In summazizing the parking issue, staff is still slightly concerned with available <br />parking, even though the development meets city ordinances. I would encourage the <br />Planning Commission to visit the site and assess the situation for yourselves. And <br />while you are out visiting the site, imagine that this project originally included <br />another 5,000 squaze feet of building. Cleazly, the Planning Commission and City <br />'~ Council made the right decision to work with the developer in reducing this project's <br />density. <br />• LANDSCAPING <br />As mentioned earlier, the perimeter landscaping has already been approved as part of the <br />previous plans. Those plans did include a row of pine trees and some overstories along <br />the west property line to provide an adequate buffer between this commercial <br />development and the Guardian Angels facility, immediately to the west. With the <br />proposed auto repair facility orienting its overhead doors towards Highway 169, and <br />there being no access drives or activity occurring on the west side of the building (facing <br />Guardian Angels), the approved landscape plan should be adequate to provide a <br />necessary buffer. <br />As part of the conditional use permit for the three existing auto repair facilities, several <br />operational conditions were attached. Staff believes those same conditions should be <br />attached to Kennedy Transmission to provide consistency with the Auto Malls operation <br />and maintain the concerns addressed as part of the original review process. These <br />specific conditions are outlined in staff recommendation. <br />• <br />s:plenning:pc:cu95-06 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.