My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9.6. SR 12-16-1996
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
1993 - 1999
>
1996
>
12/16/1996
>
9.6. SR 12-16-1996
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:32:32 AM
Creation date
5/6/2003 7:13:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
12/16/1996
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Memo to the Mayor and City Council <br />December 16, 1996 <br /> <br /> City <br />Lakeville <br /> <br />Savage <br /> <br />Champlin <br /> <br />Brooklyn Park <br />Woodbury <br /> <br />Plymouth <br /> <br />Page 3 <br /> <br />Class I Restaurants <br /> <br />Permitted <br /> <br />B3, B4, CBDC <br /> <br />C2, C3, C4, C5 <br /> <br />B2, B3 <br /> <br />Conditional Use Permit <br /> <br />(C 1) Office Business District, C2, <br />CH <br /> <br />031) Central Business <br /> <br />B1, B2, 033) Shopping Center <br /> FD 1, FD3 <br /> <br />(C2) Central Business <br /> <br />The cities of Brooklyn Park and Woodbury most closely resemble Elk River in <br />how they review hotels/motels and class I restaurants. Those cities have <br />them as permitted uses in some commercial zones and conditional uses in <br />some commercial zones. <br /> <br />Planning Commission meeting <br /> <br />At the November 26,1996 Planning Commission meeting Paul Bell, owner of <br />Bridgemans Restaurant, spoke out against the proposed amendment. He felt <br />it placed and undue burden on business owners and they should not be <br />penalized because some highway commercial districts are adjacent to <br />residential areas. <br /> <br />The fact these uses are also permitted uses in the C 1 (Central Commercial) <br />district was also brought up. In the C 1 district, the surrounding properties <br />are zoned either C2 (Office) district or industrial with the exception of 4 <br />small lots on Jackson Avenue which are adjacent to a R2(Two Family <br />Residential) district; therefore, compatibility with adjacent residential zones <br />is less of an issue. <br /> <br />There was also some discussion regarding the locating of restaurants in <br />shopping centers and infill development downtown. If a class I restaurant <br />locates in a shopping center, many of the concerns associated with a class I <br />restaurant will have been addressed during the review required for the <br />shopping center. Infill development downtown will be buffered from <br />residential zones by office commercial zones and should not significantly <br />impact those residential zones. <br /> <br />s :\planning\scott\oa9616cc.doc <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.