My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4.2. BA AGENDA 11-10-2009
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Board of Adjustments
>
BOA Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2009
>
11-10-2009
>
4.2. BA AGENDA 11-10-2009
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/6/2009 2:35:23 PM
Creation date
11/6/2009 2:35:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
BASR
date
11/10/2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Case file: V 09-07 r?lk ltivcr l=ord <br />Page 3 Area Identification s.~ variance <br />Applicable Regulations <br />Variance Criteria <br />7. Literal enforcement of the ordinance will cause undue hardshib. <br />Signage is an important aspect of nearly all commercial businesses. The City must balance the <br />needs of an individual business with the needs of businesses in the immediate area, as excessive <br />signage leads a perception of clutter, may be confusing, and detracts from the image of the <br />community. The ordinance establishes clear sign regulations that provide several options for <br />signage for each business. Literal enforcement of the ordinance would allow 4 signs total. The <br />The applicant has to prove that the 5`'' sign is a hardship. The 4 signs permitted could advertise <br />Ford, Chrysler, Kia, Mahindra. The applicant chooses the use of one of their signs for <br />changeable copy. Hardship based on literal reading of the ordinance is not strictly <br />demonstrated. <br />2. The hardrhih is cazrsed by sbeclal conditions and circumstances which are beculiar to the ~r_o_~erty and the <br />structure anvolved and which are not characteristic o or a~t~licable to other lands or structure in the ,came area <br />The property is unique in that there are few large parcels within the community with long <br />frontages on Highway 10, and Highway 169. In response, the City- drafted an ordinance <br />designed to give these properties special consideration. The subject property% is not more unique <br />than the other businesses with the same considerations. <br />3. "lhe .rbecial conditions and circumstances are not a consequence of the~etitioner's oavn action or inaction <br />Signs #1, 2, and 5 are existing signs. It is impossible to fit 2 more signs between sign #2 and <br />sign #5 while preser~-ing the setback requirement. Sign #2 was installed prior to the separation <br />requirement. If given the opportunity, it it likely that the 150 foot separation would have been <br />maintained. <br />4. The literal abt~lication of the brovisions of this ordinance would derive the 1~etitioner o, f rights enZoa ed b other <br />t~ro~ertie.r an the same dzstnct under- the terms o~this ordinance <br />No other lots in the immediate area have the necessary frontage for multiple freestanding <br />signage. Throughout the City, similar businesses have less freestanding signage. If approved, <br />this business would have the most freestanding signage in the City. <br />5. The variance avill not be iniurious to or adversely affect the health safety or sve~are o~the residents of the city or <br />the nernhborhood where the bro~erty i r located and will be in keeling with rbirit and intent of the ordinance <br />The purpose behind sign regulations is that in the absence of sign regulations, the ability of <br />signage to inform the public is lessened as each sign competes with another. A good example <br />may be found in the large changeable copy sign on the subject site (with its animated copy, <br />brighter lighting, and larger size) overshadows the other signage on the property. This <br />competition can confuse traffic. The concern with a proliferation of signage is the question, <br />when is enough? <br />S:APLANNING M:11N\Case Files\Variance\V U9-07 F,lk River Foxd\BOA staff report ll-1U-U9.doc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.