Laserfiche WebLink
City Council Minutes Page 5 <br />September 21, 20x9 <br />MOTS®I!1 CA,RRZED 4~1. Mayor Klinzing opposed, <br />MOVED BY COUI~C~LMEMBER GUMPHREY AND SECONDED BY <br />COUNC~LMEI~IBER ZERwAS TO APPROVE THE COMMERCIAL REN~EL <br />LICENSE BY JOHN FAHEY, JR. MOTION CARRIED 5-0. <br />5.3. RegueS~ b r~Du~~y Development for Side Plan Review Apo.xoval o~ a 53-unit <br />A artment and Conditional Use Permit A royal to Amend the Planned Unit <br />Develo ment A regiment All in Lot 1 Block 1 of Elk River Station 3za Addition -Case <br />No. SP o9--03 and CU o9-20 - Public Heari~z <br />Mr. Barnhart presented the staff report. <br />Mayor 7~linzing opened the public hearing. <br />David Rannello, vice-president of the Elk River Station Homeowner's Association,1722U <br />Quincy Street, stated residents knew an apartment building would eventually be built in this <br />location, but was not aware that it would be fixed income housing. He felt these was already <br />a good nux oflow-income housing in the city, and feels there is a demand for higher rents, <br />stating examples of recent rental prices of townhomes in the development. He felt this was a <br />progressive area, with the commuter rail soon to be available, and the development should <br />target a different market. He also expressed traffic concerns, with as well as the proximity of <br />the apartment building to the already built townhouses. He is concerned with the use of the <br />association amenities being used by the apartment renters as well as property appearance <br />guidelines the zest of the neighborhood follows. <br />Matt Stevens,105$8 ~-172~d Lane, feels the proposed parking spaces for this apartment <br />building are inadequate. He expressed concerns with inoperable vehicles using parking <br />spaces thereby degrading the look of the development, He also feels animosity will occur <br />between apartment tenants and townhome residents due to association amenities being used <br />and damaged by apartment renters. He felt this property should not be allowed for low <br />income housing, <br />Sue Dunham, board member of the Pullinan Place Cooperative,171St and Quincy, agreed <br />with the comments from the previous speakers and expressed concerns with traffic <br />congestion and safety issues traveling in and out of the development both by vehicle and on <br />foot. <br />Scott waltz, 10575 -171[t Avenue, expressed concerns with the loss of equity in his <br />townhome and didn't want Section $ vouchers to be allowed in this apartment development. <br />Ms. Mehelich explained the tax credits and how they would benefit the developer and <br />renters, She stated there haven't been any Section $ vouchers issued for a few years and <br />those would not be accepted in this development. <br />Alisa wallaee,17214 Quincy Street, expressed concerns with property lines changing and <br />the affect that will have on her front yard, as hex townhome unit faces the parking lot of the <br />proposed apartment building. <br />Jahn Duffy, the developer, spoke to the council and audience, explaining he would try to <br />address traffic concerns by working with the City an any suggested changes. He discussed <br />the screening, which would prevent headlights from affecting townhome residents, and <br />stated the building would be the same upscale building that was previously approved in <br />