My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7.2. SR 11-18-1996
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
1993 - 1999
>
1996
>
11/18/1996
>
7.2. SR 11-18-1996
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:32:30 AM
Creation date
5/6/2003 5:15:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
11/18/1996
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Screening: Marshall and Shiely have met with the adjacent property owners <br />(to the south) to address any concerns they may of had. It is mutually <br />agreeable to all concerned to have the screening for this project placed south <br />of 213th Ave. (on the residential properties). Having the screening close to <br />these homes blocks out more height, which is a concern because of the plant's <br />silo. Further, it is less likely that plantings on the south side of 213th Ave. <br />will be disturbed due to future reclamation. <br /> <br />Additional plantings to screen this operation from the Highway should not be <br />necessary. The elevation of the plant site is quit a bit lower than the <br />Highway and there is natural vegetation in place. <br /> <br />RECOMMENDATION: <br /> <br />The Planning Commission felt that the proposed ready-mix plant met the 7 <br />standards setforth in Section 900.42 of the City Code of Ordinances by which <br />a conditional use permit request. They recommended approval of this <br />request under the conditions outlined in the attached conditional use permit. <br /> <br />Shiely met with the neighbors adjacent to this site and resolved the <br />outstanding issues. No neighbors showed-up at the public hearing, however, <br />there was one nay vote from the Planning Commission. The concern that <br />generated this nay vote was traffic on Highway 169 and County Road 33 <br />east. <br /> <br />s:\b&z\steverXmarshall.doc <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.