My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2. SR 09-28-2009
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2000 - 2010
>
2009
>
09-28-2009 SP JT
>
2. SR 09-28-2009
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/25/2009 11:00:54 AM
Creation date
9/25/2009 10:48:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
9/28/2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Elk River FAST phase 2 -kick-off EDA/CC/PC work session preparation <br />September 24, 2009 <br />Page 2 of 2 <br />Scenario 2 <br />Let's say we complete the FAST study assuming no interchange (overpass/underpass) access into our <br />study area but pressure for an interchange happens sooner than expected. <br />• 171 St will remain a signalized intersection in the near-term. <br />• 165th intersection may shift in its location but an intersection will remain in its vicinity and that <br />intersection becomes signalized in the near-term. <br />• Development and redevelopment reliant on access and visibility from those intersections will <br />happen over time. <br />• Properties to the south of 165th may remain undeveloped. <br />~ MNIDOT determines that they need to implement their long-term plan to build an interchange <br />somewhere in this reach of Highway 10 and close all other at-grade intersections. <br />• MN/DOT determines an interchange south of 165th is the only viable option due to conflicts with <br />existing development. <br />Or, existing developed lands within FAST are purchased to build the interchange. <br />Scenario 3 <br />Let's say we accept the eventuality of an interchange and we convince MN/DOT that 171st (or very <br />close to it) is the right place to locate it. <br />• The properties currently located directly at the intersection as well as some others will need to be <br />acquired over time to prepare for the interchange. <br />~ Once the interchange is built, new development will populate the area around the interchange. <br />Scenario 3 <br />This is the scenario used in the FAST phase 1 study. Let's say we accept the inevitability of an <br />interchange and we believe the location suggested in the first phase of FAST is the right location. <br />• The 165th and 167th intersections are closed and a new signalized intersection is opened at the <br />future interchange location. <br />• The suggested interchange location has relatively minor impact on existing development and <br />relatively close access to the rail station and existing development at 171st <br />New local street connections to the intersection are completed to provide access on both sides of <br />Highway 10. <br />New development can orient around the new intersection but also accommodateltake advantage <br />of the eventual interchange. <br />I look forward to the discussion on Monday. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact <br />me. <br />M.' IELK RIVER108-65 Focus Area Study(FAST)13 Meetings) memo EDA work session 9-24-09.DOC <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.