Laserfiche WebLink
Honorable Mayor and City Council <br />November 13, 1996 <br />Page Two <br /> <br />no projects are programed by MnDOT, we could still attempt a locally initiated project <br />with MnDOT participation. Finally, Mr. Raisanen points out that Tom Dumont, Assistant <br />District Traffic Engineer, located in St. Cloud, has been assigned to work with the City on <br />these issues. I will keep in contact with Mr. Dumont regarding the status of the issues <br />referred to in MnDOT's Annual Safety program. <br /> <br />With regard to an overhead pedestrian crossing, we have done further research regarding <br />several issues. The first pertains to the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) <br />requirements. There is no individual agency charged with enforcing the ADA standards. <br />The most likely scenario would be if the City did not follow the ADA requirements, some <br />individual may try to force the City to comply with the standards by filing suit against the <br />City. Therefore, we would recommend that any pedestrian overpass have ramps meeting <br />ADA requirements. These would dictate that ramps be at a 12:1 slope with a 5-foot <br />landing for every 30" of rise. There is another requirement which eliminates the need for <br />the landings, but lengthens the slope of the ramp to 20:1. One way to minimize the impact <br />of the ADA requirements for ramping and the effect that this has on the cost of the <br />structure is to try to pick a location where the landing point is already substantially higher <br />than the highway, therefore minimizing the amount of ramping or allowing this area to be <br />ramped using earth. We have looked at the TH 169 corridor between School Street and <br />197th, and the most likely location for minimizing the impact of ramps at each end would <br />be somewhere on the water tower side. A pedestrian overpass at this location would run <br />into the MnDOT property on the east side. Perhaps a small strip of property could be <br />acquired on the south side of the MnDOT parcel to facilitate pedestrian movements back <br />over to Dodge Avenue. <br /> <br />There are several different styles and types of pedestrian overpass. Assuming a minimum <br />width of 8 feet and a rather simple structure, the cost estimates for a overpass with full <br />ramps on each side would be approximately $850,000. To locate it where earthen ramping <br />could be accomplished would lower the cost to approximately $600,000. In addition to <br />these estimated costs monies would have to be added for pedestrian pathways from Dodge <br />on the east and Freeport on the west to the start of the pedestrian overpass. <br /> <br />With regard to funding of a pedestrian overpass, the most likely candidate would be the <br />Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA). As the City Council is aware, <br />this is a rather competitive process where the City's project would be evaluated against <br />other projects within the region and then also compete with projects State wide. We would <br />certainly recommend that the City submit the overpass as a potential project, but we are <br />really not very optimistic about it being funded in the near term. In our letter to MnDOT, <br />we asked for their thoughts on fuming sources. Potentially, there may be some highway <br />funding that could be combined with City funding to facilitate the project. We will have <br />to wait until MnDOT responds regarding this issue. <br /> <br />230/347-1303.nov <br /> <br /> <br />