Laserfiche WebLink
• Drainage collects along the fire lane on the west side of the building and flows <br />around to the retaining wall location. A spillway or pipe will be needed to convey <br />this drainage to the bio retention pond. <br />• Grades at the rear of the building are significantly lower than the patio/decks. No <br />access to the ground at the rear of the building from these units will be possible. <br />• The original wetland delineation report for this project needs to be resubmitted <br />relative to the wetland boundary on this lot. Prior to any work being done on this <br />lot, the wetland boundary originally delineated needs to be reestablished and verified <br />by the city's Environmental Division. <br />• After grading and construction of the bio retention pond adjacent to the wetland on <br />the north side of the lot, a 25-foot width measured from the wetland edge, needs to <br />be planted in native plantings. Recommendations for planting materials can be <br />obtained from the Soil and Water Conservation District. At the edge of the 25-foot <br />planting, wetland buffer signs according to the city's ordinance need to be installed. <br />• The construction sequencing needs to be done in a manner to protect the bio <br />retention pond area from sediment washing into the area, as well as compaction <br />from construction equipment. The area should be protected with fencing prior to <br />construction and with silt fence immediately after constnuction. <br />• The grading appears to involve a significant amount of export. Construction traffic <br />on 172°d Avenue needs to be limited to that portion between Twin Lakes and the <br />construction driveway. <br />C. Utility Plan <br />• The sanitary sewer service seems excessively deep. <br />• A sampling manhole 48 inches in diameter needs to be placed on the sanitary sewer <br />service. <br />• Add an 8" gate valve to the water service line. <br />• A review by the city's Fire Department has determined that the hydrant at the <br />northeast comer of the building is not necessary and can be replaced with a hydrant <br />located in the parking lot median immediately opposite the water service into the <br />building. <br />• How is the roof drainage routed? Are roof leaders connected directlyto the storm <br />sewer? <br />• It appears that there are existing small utilities in the area of the proposed driveway <br />which may cause conflicts with the driveway and/or proposed storm sewer. <br />D. Erosion and Sediment Control <br />• The site is large enough that it will require a NPDES permit. A copy of the permit <br />once obtained, must be provided to the city. <br />• A Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) must be submitted and <br />approved for the site. The SWPPP must be in an 8 '/z" x 11" format with a page for <br />the signatures of the owner, engineer and contractor. <br />• No grading may begin on the site until a signed SWPPP and a copy of the NPDES <br />permit have been provided to the city, as well as an initial inspection of the perimeter <br />erosion control measures and rock driveway construction has taken place and been <br />approved. <br />S:\PLANNING MAIN\Case Files\SP\SP 08-06 ER Station Apts\03-10-08 engis comments.doc Page 2 <br />