Laserfiche WebLink
~2~ The Applicant should have l~nown that beeping mope than three dogs ~equ~tes a <br />p~•ivate fennel license, The failuxe to comply with the city o~.•dinance wises concerns <br />fog the City Council about compliance with city fequ.iiements if a private fennel <br />license is approved and the Applicant is allowed to continue to have as many as eight <br />dogs on the Pfope~ty, <br />~3~ Qne of the dogs on the P~.•ope~ty has been declared a patent~ally dange~•ous dog <br />pursuant to city code, The Council does not feel it is app~opxiate for a potentially <br />dange~•ous dog to be boaided in a private fennel with seven other dogs and is <br />conce~.•ned about the ability to con~.•ol this dog with so many other dogs on the <br />Pxope~ty, <br />~4} The City Council has received testimony from a nuinbe~ of people complainin about <br />g <br />noise from the dogs on the Pfope~ty. <br />~5~ The Council has ieceived testimony and co~nplai~.ts from a numbei of people who <br />fear fog: theif• safety given the la~•ge number and agg~.•essive nature of the dogs on the <br />P~ope~ty, <br />~6} The Council finds that it is not consistent with the public health, safety and welfat•e to <br />app~•ove a private fennel license allowing up to eight dogs on this P~ope~ty, due to the <br />presence of a potentially dange~•ous dog on the P.~ope~ty, the apparent agg~•essive <br />nature of the dogs on the P~•ope~ty, and the noise generated by the large number of <br />dogs on the Ptope~ty, <br />~7} The City Council Ends that beeping of mope than three dogs on the Piope~ty <br />constitutes a nuisance due to the agg~•essive natuie of the dogs, the pe~.•ceived threat to <br />public safety and the noise complaints f~•om barbing, <br />S;~l~esolutio~.s~Kra~se Dcnial,DQC <br />