My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ORD 09-08
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Ordinances
>
2000 - 2009
>
2009
>
ORD 09-08
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2013 1:25:42 PM
Creation date
8/27/2009 3:12:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
ORD
date
8/17/2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
(6) At the hearing, both the owner and the animal control authority may <br />present the testimony of live witnesses; cross - examine witnesses, and <br />present documentary evidence. <br />(7) The burden of proof shall be upon the animal control authority. The <br />standard of proof shall be clear and convincing evidence if the authority <br />seeks to destroy the dog; in other cases it shall be by a preponderance of <br />the evidence. <br />�8} After considering all evidence pertaining to the dog, the hearing officer <br />shall make such order as they deem proper, including ordering the animal <br />control authority to take the dog into custody if the dog is not currently in <br />custody. <br />(9) Any person who fails or refuses to release the dog to the animal control <br />authority or law enforcement agent upon demand, or after it has been <br />found by a hearing officer to be dangerous and ordered into custody, shall <br />be guilty of a misdemeanor. <br />(10) Authority to order destruction: The hearing officer, upon finding that a <br />dog is dangerous hereunder, is authorized to order, as part of the <br />disposition of the case, that the dog be destroyed based on a written order <br />containing findings of fact establishing that each of the following criteria <br />are present: <br />The dog is dangerous, as demonstrated by a vicious attack, an <br />unprovoked attack, an attack without warning, or multiple attacks; <br />and <br />The owner of the dog has demonstrated an inability or <br />unwillingness to sufficiently control the dog in order to prevent the <br />injury to persons or other animals; and <br />The owner cannot, will not, does not, or otherwise refuses to <br />provide proof of the liability insurance or surety bond as required <br />in Section I0- 93(a )[2 ). <br />(l 1 } If the declaration or destruction is upheld by the hearing officer, actual <br />expenses of the hearing up to a maximum of $1 ,000, as well as all <br />Maintenance Costs, will be the responsibility of the dog's Owner. The <br />hearing officer shall issue a decision on the matter within 10 days after the <br />hearing. The decision shall be delivered to the dog's Owner by hand <br />delivery or registered mail as soon as practical and a copy shall be <br />provided to the City. The decision of the hearing officer is final. <br />Section 10 -100 - Destruction of Certain Do s. The Police Chief and/or hearing officer <br />are authorized to order the destruction or other disposition of any dog, after proper notice is <br />given pursuant to Section 10 -99 and upon a finding that: <br />-9- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.