My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-09-2009 PC MIN
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Minutes
>
2000 - 2009
>
2009
>
06-09-2009 PC MIN
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/12/2009 2:37:27 PM
Creation date
8/12/2009 2:34:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
PCM
date
6/9/2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Planning Conunission Minutes <br />June 9, 2009 <br />--------------------------- <br />Page 3 <br />amendment. She continued by stating that in order to consider an amendment to the <br />Comprehensive Plan the following should be considered: 1) Is the project consistent with <br />the land use plan? 2) Does the project move Elk River towards its vision for the future? 3) <br />Is the project consistent with the policies contained in the Plan? <br />Ms. Haug stated that the issue is not with Waste Management and how they operate the <br />landfill. She noted that they have been a good corporate citizen and use state-of-the-art <br />technology. The issue is whether a significant expansion of this land use is consistent arith <br />the City's policies and goals as reflected in the City's Comprehensive Plan. <br />Brad Scheib, Land Use Planner with Hoisington-Koegler -stated his firm was the primary <br />author of the City of Elk River's Comprehensive Plan in 2004. He stated that one of the <br />initiatives of the plan included working with the city last year to explore alternative land use <br />options for the gravel mining area. Their charge was to look land use and fiscal impacts <br />related to an expansion of the landfill. He reviewed direct and peripheral impacts <br />(peripheral representing 2,000 ft. from the landfill) with two scenarios: 1) the existing <br />landfill boundary, 2) landfill boundarywith the expansion. He stated that their assumptions <br />were based on the marketplace, similar projects in Elk River, property values, phasing of the <br />gravel mining and closing of the landfill in 2030. He stated that they came up with a model <br />to demonstrate economic impacts with each scenario, factoring in the information provided <br />the landfill and gravel mining companies. He stated that based on this information, they <br />project a possible $400 million differentiation in propertytax revenues between 2009 and <br />2080, should the landfill expand. He stated the potential job loss differentiation was similar <br />to the tax base loss. <br />Ms. Haug introduced John Kellas, representing Waste Management. Mr. Kellar, Area <br />Manager, discussed benefits to the communityprovided bythe landfill. He stated that the <br />landfill was established in 1972, and was the first landfill in the state to install a synthetic <br />liner and leachate collection system. He stated that Waste Management took over in 1995. <br />He discussed the methane recoveryproject which is a joint project with Elk River Municipal <br />Utilities and Sherburne County, noting that the project received the EPA project of the year <br />award. Mr. Kellas noted that Waste Management submitted a full application, including the <br />conditional use permit request for the expansion, but that staff recommended the land use <br />amendment and rezoning be reviewed fast. Mr. Kellas provided a diagram of the process <br />they have followed in placuung for this expansion. He stated that they have gone through a <br />very extensive regulatoryprocess including EAW (Environmental Assessment Worksheet), <br />EIS (Environmental Impact Statement), the MPCA, NPDES Permit, gas plant permits, Met <br />Council permits, as well as Sherburne County, and are now seeking city approval. <br />Mr. Kellas stated that Waste Management has spent $14 million paying vendors in the city of <br />Elk River over the last five years. This figure does not take into account indirect benefits to <br />the community such as patronizing local hotels, restaurants, and retail. He stated that their <br />payroll is $1 million/year and employees have a combined 175 years of services. He stated <br />that the average length of employment is 12 years and average employee salary is <br />$65,000/year. He stated that properrytaxes, gravel mining fees, and landfill fees total $1 <br />million/year. Mr. Kellas explained that the methane power generating facilityproduces <br />green power for 7,500 homes and the number of engines will be increased from four to <br />twelve. He noted that Waste Management contributes $50,000 in local donations. <br />Mr. Kellas suggested that instead of the annual city clean up event, Waste Management <br />could mail out a free coupon twice a year to each resident to drop off their items at the <br />landfill. He noted they are continually working to expand the number of items that can be <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.