My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5.1. SR 08-03-2009
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2000 - 2010
>
2009
>
08-03-2009
>
5.1. SR 08-03-2009
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/31/2009 10:22:23 AM
Creation date
7/31/2009 10:19:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
8/3/2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Elk River Library <br />10 0^ <br />n <br />n ~~ <br />00 <br />~o <br />Optimize Energy Performance <br />Design Application <br />Elk River Library <br />1 /18/2008 <br />Construction Application <br />Credit 1-Version 2.2 <br />9/20/2007 <br />The applicant submitted a signed LEED Submittal Template, energy modeling output reports and utility rate <br />information. The LEED Submittal Template indicates an energy cost savings of 47.6% in comparison to ASHRAE <br />90.1-2004 minimum requirements. Upon review of the LEED Submittal Template, a few issues were identified <br />that need further clarification before credit achievement can be determined. The issues are: <br />1. In table 1.4, it appears the applicant calculated lighting power density using the allowable LPD and the space- <br />by-space method, instead of the building area method. However, it is unclear how the baseline lighting power <br />density of 1.53 W/sf was determined. <br />2. The fan supply volume listed in table 1.4 indicates differences between the supply rates in the proposed and <br />baseline models. It is unclear from the documentation if the ventilation rates are identical in both models, per <br />ASHRAE 90.1-2004 Section G3.1.2.5 requirements. <br />TECHNICAL ADVICE: Please provide additional documentation addressing the issues identified above (i.e. <br />calculations and/or excerpts from the energy model input). Refer to ASHRAE 90.1-2004 Section 9 and G3.1.2.5 <br />for more information and guidance. <br />Design Application <br />11/26/2007 <br />The applicant submitted a revised LEED Submittal Template and an independent lighting power density <br />calculation. The documentation addresses the issues stated in the preliminary review and supports the 47.6% <br />energy cost savings claimed. <br />On-Site Renewable Energy <br />Enhanced Commissioning <br />Enhanced Refrigerant Management <br />Design Application <br />Credit 2-Version 2.2 <br />Credit 3-Version 2.2 <br />Credit 4-Version 2.2 <br />9/20/2007 <br />The LEED Submittal Template indicates that the refrigerants selected for base building HVAC&R equipment <br />have a combined refrigerant impact per ton of 35.3, below the allowable threshold of 100. <br />Measurement & Verification <br />Green Power <br />Credit 5-Version 2.2 <br />Credit 6-Version 2.2 <br />Page 7 of 13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.