Laserfiche WebLink
ZB.7 Multiway Stop Applications <br />suv~- _ P{~I?~; 1 <br />Multiway stop control can be useful as a safety measure <br />at intersections if certain traffic conditions exist. Safety <br />concerns associated with multiway stops include <br />pedestrians, bicyclists, and all road users expecting other <br />road users to stop. Multiway stop control is used where the <br />volume of traffic on the intersecting roads is approximately <br />equal. <br />The restrictions on the use of STOP signs described in <br />Section 2B.5 also apply to multiway stop applications. <br />GUIDANCE: <br />The decision to install multiway stop control should be <br />based on an engineering study. <br />The following criteria should be considered in the <br />engineering study for amulti-way STOP sign installation: <br />A. Where traffic control signals are justified, the multi- <br />way stop is an interim measure that can be installed <br />quickly to control traffic while arrangements are being <br />made for the installation of the traffic control signal. <br />B. A crash problem, as indicated by 5 or more reported <br />crashes in a 12-month period that are susceptible to <br />correction by a multi-way stop installation. Such <br />crashes include right- and left-turn collisions as well <br />as right-angle collisions. <br />C. Minimum volumes: <br />1. The vehicular volume entering the intersection from <br />the major street approaches (total of both <br />approaches) averages at least 300 vehicles per hour <br />for any 8 hours of an average day, and <br />2. The combined vehicular, pedestrian, and bicycle <br />volume entering the intersection from the minor <br />street approaches (total of both approaches) <br />averages at least 200 units per hour for the same 8 <br />hours, with an average delay to minor-street <br />vehicular traffic of at least 30 seconds per vehicle <br />during the highest hour, but <br />3. If the 85th-percentile approach speed of the major- <br />street traffic exceeds 40 mph, the minimum <br />vehicular volume warrants are 70 percent of the <br />above values. <br />D. Where no single criterion is satisfied, but where <br />Criteria B, C.1, and C.2 are all satisfied to 80 percent <br />of the minimum. values. Criterion C.3 is excluded <br />from this condition. <br />OPTION: <br />Other criteria that may be considered in an engineering <br />study include: <br />A. The need to control left-turn conflicts; <br />B. The need to control vehicleJpedestrian conflicts near <br />locations that generate high pedestrian volumes; <br />C. Locations where a road user, after stopping, cannot <br />see conflicting traffic and is not able to reasonably <br />safely negotiate the intersection unless conflicting <br />cross traffic is also required to stop; and <br />D. An intersection of two residential neighborhood <br />collector (through) streets of similar design and <br />operating characteristics where multiway stop control <br />would improve traffic operational characteristics of <br />the intersection. <br />