Laserfiche WebLink
City Council M~.nutes Page 7 <br />~u~ae ~5, ZoO~ <br />Councilmember Zerwas stated he had no issues with allowing signage every 300 feet, He <br />stated other requests sllauld follow the variance process so Council could review on an <br />individual basis to determine what is best for the city, <br />Cauncilmember Morin stated the criteria for variances are not easy to meet, He suggested an <br />alternative of allowing stgnage 200/250 feet rntervals, <br />Councihne~nber Gumphrey concurred with Counciline~nber Zertivas and stated it would be <br />impossible to get the sign ordinances to work for ever~T business, <br />Mr, Barnhart stated tlae intent was to keep consistent with past practice. He stated signage <br />tends to lose its effect when there are too many, <br />~i~°ectional Si~na~e <br />Mr. Leeseberg noted directional signs are not regulated but can be 4 square feet. <br />Mr. Barnhart stated directional signs wouldn't be included in the total allowable signage <br />calculations for a property, <br />Commercial Cons~ructian and Real Estate Sims <br />Council. indicated tl~ey would like to allow these signs to be up to G4 square .foot in size, <br />MGVED BY CDUNCILMEMBER ZERV~IAS AND SECONDED BY <br />CCUNCILMEMBER wESTGAARD Ta APPROVE THE SIGN CHANGES <br />RECGIVIMENDED BY STAFF KITH THE FQLLDwING CHANGES: <br />1, CGMMERCIAL~BASED SIGNS CAN BE G4 SQUARE FEET. <br />2, LARGE LaT SIGNS SHALL NGT HAVE RESTRZCTIaNS LII~IITING <br />THE PRGPERTY FRQNTAGE TQ ONE SIDE, <br />3. THE REVISED RURAL BASED BUSINESS SZGNAGE GRDINANCE <br />SHALL REMAIN AS PROPGSED ZN THE STAFF REPORT, <br />MQTIGN CARRIED 5-0, <br />Councilmember Gumphrey thanked staff for a good job. <br />5.5. Re uest b Geor e Larson for Extension on Code Enforcement Issues Relatin to the <br />B owl.in~Alle~ at i 3.~ G ~,.,, Hwv 10 <br />Mr, Barnlart presented the staff report. Mr, Larson was at the meeting but had no <br />comments, <br />Councilmember Gumphrey questioned if the new owner would be required to remedy these <br />nuisance issues if the property sold, <br />Mr, Becl~ stated yes that the issues would go with the sale of the property. <br />MGVED BY CGUNCZLMEMBER MUTIN AND SECONDED BY <br />CUUNCILMEMBER GUMPHREY TD APPROVE AN E~TENSI®N Ta <br />