3.4. SR 07-06-2009 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Miller, Jessica From: Benoit, Steve Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 10:54 AM To: Miller, Jessica Subject: RE: Scanned image from MX-M1100 That's a good thought. In thinking more about the language, I'm wondering if we should tweak the language in the requirements. Here is a thought: "The areas of Lions Park and Woodland Trails Park not needed for the operation of the event will remain open for use by the general public." It is reasonable to assume they may need to monopolize certain parts of the trial for their race, but they would not need to utilize the entire Woodland Trials Park for the event. With that here would be the reasons why we would not grant exclusive access to the entire park: "While certain park amenities will need to be utilized exclusively by special events, the recreation department feels that it is important to promote access to general use areas of city parks to the public, such as open space, during special events." Let me know your thoughts on this. Thanks! -----Original Message----- From: Miller, Jessica Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 8:48 AM To: Benoit, Steve Subject: RE: Scanned image from MX-M1100 Sounds good. Tina wants me to add a sentence on this to the memo (in addition to the condition) -something like the "applicant is requesting exclusive access of the park... " Can you give me a reason why P&R cannot or does not wish to grant exclusive access? Thank you! Jessica -----Original Message----- From: Benoit, Steve Sent: Friday, June 26, 2009 2:49 PM To: Miller, Jessica Subject: RE: Scanned image from MX-M1100 Jessica, Thanks for forwarding the info. Bill and I talked and would like to request to add the following info to the requirements: "Lions Park and Woodland Trails Park will remain open for use by the general public during the event." Let me know if you have any questions. Thanks!