My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2. SR 06-29-2009
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2000 - 2010
>
2009
>
06-29-2009 SP JT
>
2. SR 06-29-2009
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/26/2009 1:55:59 PM
Creation date
6/26/2009 1:48:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
6/29/2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
local distribution.) If the City were to sell the municipal electric utility, Connexus also has interest in <br />acquiring the municipal electric utility. Connexus staff will be looking into these all of these scenarios; <br />however execution of any of these scenarios would require GRE board approval. <br />Because GRE board approval is needed for Connexus to enter into any contract with or sale of ERMU, <br />solid numbers for these scenarios are not available at this time. For the purpose of discussion, outlined <br />in this memo are four scenarios: Renegotiating an all requirements power purchase contract with <br />Connexus Energy, Participating in BSII and supplementing with other peaking plant ownership, <br />Participation in B SII and supplementing with a partial requirements power purchase and ancillary <br />services contract (for example with Connexus), and the sale of the electric utility. (It should be noted <br />that participation in BSII and the sale of the electric utility are not mutually exclusive. Participation in <br />BSII does not exclude the City from selling the electric utility at a later date. The ownership in BSII <br />may be an asset in the sale of the electric utility.) Also outlined in this memo are benefits and <br />disadvantages of municipal ownership of an electric utility. <br />Renegotiate All Requirements Purchase Power Contract with Connexus Energy <br />1. Connexus cannot enter into this contract without GRE board approval. The GRE board is <br />made up of representatives of the coop members of GRE. <br />2. A rolling 10-year contract similar in structure to the current contract may be an option. The <br />margin markup for Connexus would be negotiable. <br />3. Early contract renegotiation discussions involved only fixed term 5-year contracts beginning <br />in 2014. The first 5-year contracts would have a 5% adder for Connexus. This would be on <br />top of any GRE wholesale rate increase. The consecutive second 5-year contract would have <br />an additional 5% adder for Connexus (for an overall increase of 10% over 10 years). Again <br />this would be on top of any GRE wholesale rate increases. Power Cost Adjustment (PCA) <br />would also still be added on top of the other increases. After the first two 5-year contracts, <br />Connexus was not willing to commit to any numbers. <br />4. GRE would require the elimination of the 5% discount in wholesale power to Connexus for <br />ERMU's load. <br />5. The inclusion of a territory acquisition moratorium clause may determine how small the <br />margin markup Connexus is willing to negotiate. <br />6. This option doesn't require bonding or have any financial repayment obligation from <br />ratepayers because there would be no ownership in any plant. Under this scenario, ERMU <br />would be a "renter". <br />7. Best/worst case scenarios <br />a. Best =competitive rates, good terms with Connexus and GRE, local control of rates, <br />allowed territory acquisition with City urban district growth. <br />b. Worst =noncompetitive rates, high PCAs, no control over wholesale rates, not <br />allowed to grow with City (i.e. same City services not available to all tax-payers). <br />Participation in Big Stone II with ownershib in other beakin~ blant (brobably gas facilities) <br />1. BSII LOI needs to be signed by July 15tH <br />2. Supplemental power and services could be a-la-cart. These services wouldn't need to be <br />determined by July 15th, but rather could be determined anytime prior to the termination <br />date of the current power supply contract in late 2018. Most likely supplemental peaking <br />would come from gas facilities. The ancillary services could be contracted out. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.