My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3.1. & 3.2. PCSR 06-23-2009
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Packets
>
2006-2010
>
2009
>
06-23-2009 SPEC
>
3.1. & 3.2. PCSR 06-23-2009
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/15/2013 8:35:09 AM
Creation date
6/19/2009 1:50:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
PCSR
date
6/23/2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
49
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• One of your key assumptions under the no expansion scenario is that the gravel mining area <br />will be gradually reclaimed "as extraction is completed and reuse occurs". You state that <br />this transition will start in 2012.Have you asked Tiller about these assumption? Just for <br />instance, The Maple Grove Gravel Mining Area was mined for 25 years before 1/3 of the <br />area was available for the development of Arbor Lakes. <br />• Have you calculated all of the direct and indirect jobs associated with the SDA? <br />• Is a $1 million dollar annual payroll over 37 years "short term jobs''? <br />• Are you aware of the numerous advances that are being made every year in waste to energy <br />technology? <br />• If technology were to emerge between now and 2080 that would allow the vast supply of <br />waste stored at ERL to be converted into a clean, cost effective alternative energy source, <br />do you think that might change the business location decisions for alternative energy, <br />technology based businesses? <br />• If that happened 10 years from now, how would it change your projections? 20 years? 30 <br />years? 40 years? 70 years? <br />• The Metropolitan Council makes 20-year forecasts for household and employment growth <br />every 10 years. Based on numerous generalized assumptions you are making fiscal impact <br />projections over 70 years into the future. Are you really suggesting that these projections <br />are accurate and the City of Elk River should rely on them in making a decision of this <br />magnitude? <br />Sincerely, <br />Elk River Landfill, Inc. <br /> <br />Debra Walters <br />District Manager <br />c: John Shardlow, Bonestroo <br />John Kellas, Waste Management <br />Gary Sauer, Tiller Corporation <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.