Laserfiche WebLink
City Counc~I mutes <br />lay ~ 8, ~~09 <br />Council took a ~5 minute recess at 9.~5 a~m, <br />Page ~ <br />Cancil~nember urnphrey stated he likes the study for the lon~te~:rn future but felt the <br />area west of Highway ~~ should be included, He stated no issues with lifting the <br />moratorium. <br />CounciLmember 'estgaard stated they should decide whether to expand the study area to <br />include tkie west ~Iighway ~~ area, He stated na issues with lifting the moratarzun~. <br />Mayor ~i.n~i~g stated existing businesses gill need to betaken rata cansidetation if grant <br />funds are ~~eceived. <br />Councilember lVlotin stated they must lool~ at ghat is ~aest far the city and need to plan far <br />the long-tern., He stated the city needs to plan for 30 years o~~t; otherwise development gill <br />be piecemeal and guiding us rather than us guiding it, He stated properties will have Hoare <br />value based on the concepts in the study, ~ ~e further noted the ~terchange location Hasn't <br />been selected yet. He stated he is not in favor of lifting the moratorium. and would like to <br />approve this item as outlined ~ tlae staff report, <br />staff was directed to come bacl~ to Council arz June ~ with le~rels of service options for <br />expanding the study area to include west I~ih~cray 10~ <br />ll~r, deck ques~.oned if staff should prepare a resolution to consider extending the <br />rnoratoriunl~ ~t was Council consensus to let the moratorium run out to its June ~ deadline. <br />Cou~ncilnaenaber otin was opposed. <br />G.3, ~nterchan~e ~~ant <br />_ a <br />This item continued from earlier an the meeting agenda, <br />The Council agreed there was no harm or risl~ in moving fvtward with applying for the <br />grant. <br />ov~~ s~ courrrl~~~n~~~~ ~T~rr A~ s~~o~r~~~ ~~ <br />~~UN~Ll1~IElViB~~. G~11~~PHRI'~'Y T~ AUTH~R.I~ T~I~F T~ API~L~ FAR <br />TR~L.f R~iLL it\T~ 1T14JTii,J1^ A~~J, J.1~ J~V^ <br />$~~. ~ardinance Anaendna.ent Re~ardin~ ~e~ali~ed G~atnbiin~ <br />Ills. Allard presented the staff report. <br />Il~ayar rlin~ing questioned why the City of Rogers was listed in the trade area if it is not <br />contiguous to ilk diver, <br />Ms. Alla~:d stated she left the City of Rogers, along with the City of Timmerman in the <br />amendment because tt eras the arig~nal ordinance. the stated sloe was unaware of why <br />these cities were ar~g~nally Included .~a tlae trade area <br />rt was Hated they may have been included because of school district baunda~es. <br />