Laserfiche WebLink
City Council Minutes <br />May ~ 8, 200 <br />Page 4 <br />Mx. Maurex stated the grant is h.ea~rily weighted an business development X75°/0~ Frith tixe <br />rest of the weight .ven to safety and traffic issues, Ike stated the ~.~ million would only <br />cover approximateXy ~5-7°l0 of the total cost and the city would need to come up with the <br />rest of the funds. Mr, Maurer reviewed funding options and timelines if the city was to get <br />the grant. He Hated it was along-shot for Elk River to get this grant due to competition foar <br />the funds. He requested authari~ation far staff to move forward with the grant application <br />process. <br />Mayor I~linzin Hated there is no determined location for the interchange at this ti#xi.e but <br />that the city would be required to meet certain l~n~l~~7' requirements. <br />Members of the audience requested this item, be moved after Iterr~ 7.3 because they were <br />related subjects, <br />Mx, Mau~~er noted many studies and public comment periods would need to be held pxior to <br />deterrr~ning the fi~na~ location for the interchange, <br />Zt was council consensus to postpone fuxther discussion until after Item 7.3, <br />7,1., consider E~tendiri~ Tine fox eetin,ge and ob foals Under the Tax 1~baternent and <br />business ubsid ~. reem.ent far the Provo Enter rises LL Pro'ect ~'r~~&I~c ea~~~r <br />Ms, Mehelich presented the staff report, <br />Mayor In~xn opened the public hearing. <br />Pat I'rova, ~ounder• of ~lltanee Machine, Znc,-provided a history of his business in Elk <br />fiver, curxent econon~c conditions, and discussed fut~ire con~.pany expectation.. <br />Mayor Z.i,n~ing closed the public hearing. <br />M~~ED BY ~UI~I~~LI1~BE~ ~UMPHREY~ ~] C~~~ED ~ <br />DU~]'YL1Vx~14~~~R ~TAARI~ TD E~'TEND THE TAB ABATEE~'T <br />AI~I~ BU~1~E55 ~U~~II~Y AREEIET TO ~R~~ EI~TER~'R~~~, LLB <br />{ALL~.A.~CE 11~A~HINE, ~Nt~ FAR THREE YEARS NI~TI~N CARRIED 5-Q, <br />7,~, l~~c~ues t b~ City, o~ Elk River to 1~mend the itv of Elk River Land Use Relations l~elatin~ <br />_-- _ ' ,r <br />tD ~1 S lnclud~a ~Q-~.` ~~-~J~' ~~~~~~~~~.~~~1' ~~~~~~~~.~~~' ~~-~J~ Case Igo. ~~ ~~~~~ <br />_--_,I'uh~~e .~ea~r'.~~ continued ~`rom ~~rii ~D~~OQ9 Council. Mee~~ <br />M.r. Barnhart presented the staff report subn~i.tted by Mr, Leeseberg. <br />Mayof~ I~lin~ing ~e-opened the public hearing, <br />Steve Rohlf, representing Elk Ri~re~ Ford, ~7~~~ highway i0 - stated he suggested a <br />language change to staff that would define signage for campus type business settings, He <br />stated the ordinance changes would cause hardship for his business because car <br />rr~anufactures have certain signage xequi.rernents before they will allow his company to sell <br />their product and he didn.'t feel he should have to get a variance for additional sig~nage, <br />Mayan I~lin~ing closed the public hearingF <br />