My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
DRAFT 171ST STUDY 04-27-2009
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2000 - 2010
>
2009
>
04-27-2009 SP
>
DRAFT 171ST STUDY 04-27-2009
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/15/2009 2:13:48 PM
Creation date
5/15/2009 2:13:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
4/27/2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
86
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
IMPLEMENTATION <br />Use Limits <br />Several specific statutory limitations will influence the use of tax increments on <br />implementation of the plan. <br />State law requires that at least 90% of revenues from a redevelopment TIF district <br />be used to finance "the cost of correcting conditions that allow designation" of the <br />district. The majority of redevelopment and public improvement expenditures in this <br />plan meet this criteria. Several important limitations must be noted: <br />» Tax increments cannot be used for "a commons area used as a public park". The plan takes a <br />conservative position and assumes that this limitation precludes using TIF for proposed open <br />space improvements. The statute does not de fine the term "public park". The City may wish <br />to explore this issue with appropriate legal counsel. <br />» Tax increments cannot be used f or public facilities used for "social, recreational, or con f erence" <br />purposes. As with parks, the statute does not de fine these terms. Special rules apply to public <br />improvements, equipment, or other items located outside o f the TIF district. <br />Tax increments cannot be used f or these costs i f their purpose is primarily decorative or aesthetic. <br />I f the items serve a f unctional purpose, tax increments can be used unless "their cost is increased <br />by more than goo percent as a result o f the selection o f materials, design, or type as compared <br />with more commonly used materials, designs, or types forsimilar improvements, equipment or <br />items". To avoid this restriction, the right-of-way o f street to be improved should be included <br />within the boundaries o f a TIF district. <br />Other Public Finance Tools <br />Although the planning process focused on tax increment financing, it is likely that other <br />public finance tools will be needed to make long term redevelopment investments <br />within the i7ist Avenue FAST. This section highlights potential tools and their <br />application. Additional investigations will be undertaken as finance plans are prepared <br />by specific public improvement and redevelopment projects. <br />Tax Abatement <br />The name "tax abatement" is misleading. No taxes are abated using this tool. In <br />reality, tax abatement functions similar to TIF (see Minnesota Statutes Sections <br />46g.i8iz to 46g.i8i5). Each taxing jurisdiction (city, county, school district) has the <br />ability to levy a property tax equivalent to taxes paid by a parcel of property. The <br />proceeds of this levy can be used to finance any of the public improvements and other <br />redevelopment activities discussed in this plan. Since tax abatement cannot be used <br />for property in a TIF district, the best opportunity for this tool lies with locations that <br />do not qualify for a TIF district. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.